SandChigger wrote:If you read certain passages in the right light, it's obvious Kevvy is now REALLY on the defensive and is talking back to/at us. Laughing
The "if you write it, they will believe it" BS, if HE believes it, shows just how disconnected he and the fanboys are from reality. (Or maybe how connected he is to THEIR reality.)
This is the only reason I'm finishing the book. It's hilarious to see KJA effected this way, and to know that it was we the Orthodox Herbertian community that brought it about.
I love the Traviss inside joke as well.
Secher Nbiw wrote:From my dunenovels thread...
It comes across as incredibly childish when you place it next to the numerous discussions online and the criticism being brought up against the new books.
I'm talking of course about the part where Irulan and Paul discuss her writing down the history of Muad'Dib.
As I asked before, will the new book impose itself on the older books, and that question is answered. Because an inconsistency in one book is being brought up numerous times in other books, solely to have it be validated by the characters in the new books.
We all know the debate about where Paul was born. According to Dune, according to the six original novels, Paul was born on Caladan, had never made a trip through space before coming to Dune... but in the new books he gets a new homeplanet...
People pointed out the contradiction, and first it was explained on the website, which didn't quite fall on good ground. People weren't having it. So now we have characters blattantly telling us in the new books "listen up, you are wrong when you go by the information from the original six books, what we're telling you now, forty years after the publication of the first book... is what's right."
Why are they doing it?
"Her credentials were unimpeachable as the wife of Muad'dib and daughter of Shaddam IV.
Expanding on The Life of Muad'dib, she intended to explore tributaries to the river of his remarkable life. In the process, she would again see the need to alter a few details here and there, though few would realize it as long as she got the gist of the story right. Paul's propagandists and deluded religious followers remained blithely unaware of the blinders they wore, of the dark forms they refused to see."
It comes across as forced and petty, to have characters state in a book that people who believe otherwise are "deluded" and that religious fanatics will gobble up anything Irulan writes down... it's not very subtle.
So why the need to bring the topic up over and over again and why the need to constantly one-up the critics and the originals? Instead of just dropping the issue altogether, it gets pushed back into the spotlight, with a message that states: "You are wrong, we are right, here are the characters, written by us, telling you that you are wrong and we are right".
What does it add?
dunno if it's going to get deleted, so I'll just copy it to here for safe-keeping...

Bravo sir!
SHIELDED ORNITHOPTERS!!!!

What an effing retard!
(Hint KJA: Since you haven't read Dune...shields don't work in sandstorms...and they also call all worms in range and send them into a frenzy. So you know, that's bad.)
The Tleilaxu don't become religious fanatics for at least 5-3500 more years, depending on how you define it. Their religion is also a secret. The BG don't know about it until Heretics. What? The know it now, but forgot it 5000 years from now? You do know about the Bene Gesseritt's special abilities right? I don't just mean the ability to turn invisible (idiot). This has all been discussed before, you'd know about it if you hadn't had the posts deleted.
Priests of Dur...

see above. (Unless of course you were making a jab at your own readers who worshiping you would of course call themselves Priests of Durrr)