Nebiros wrote:This time I did not catch what that idiot said. He/she is so naive...Nebiros, think you could get SandChigger to join here??
(EDITED BY THE ALMIGHTY MODERATOR)

Moderators: Freakzilla, ᴶᵛᵀᴬ, Omphalos
Nebiros wrote:This time I did not catch what that idiot said. He/she is so naive...Nebiros, think you could get SandChigger to join here??
(EDITED BY THE ALMIGHTY MODERATOR)
and I just registered(under the same user name i use here), and strangely enough the forum goes down...Schu wrote:Dammit, DN is down. Where am I going to get some sweet sweet idiodicy now?
Wow, it's getting to be like an annual event, huh? Does this mean Uncle Mike forgot to watch the database size again?Warning: mysql_connect() [function.mysql-connect]: Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 104 in /data/17/0/142/143/305469/user/310695/htdocs/phpBB2/db/mysql4.php on line 48
Warning: mysql_error(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /data/17/0/142/143/305469/user/310695/htdocs/phpBB2/db/mysql4.php on line 330
Warning: mysql_errno(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /data/17/0/142/143/305469/user/310695/htdocs/phpBB2/db/mysql4.php on line 331
phpBB : Critical Error
Could not connect to the database
Honestly, I don't know how you take it. Youre like the king of the dipshits over there.Schu wrote:Dammit, DN is down. Where am I going to get some sweet sweet idiodicy now?
Thank godness, my kangaroo mouse gumbo recipe is preserved for posterity.DuneFishUK wrote:At least the Cook Book forum survives. The world is safe once more.
Didn't Byron try to distance himself from the Heroes of Dune title? Now he's got a whole little section for it. He's the worst sell-out of the bunch because he just takes it and takes it and feeds it back to everyone as quality.Schu wrote:Oh, they were implementing changes. Apparently, hunters and sandworms are part of a new section called the "grand finale"and winds of dune and paul of dune are now part of a section called heroes of dune
That would have been a good question for DC...Nekhrun wrote:Didn't Byron try to distance himself from the Heroes of Dune title? Now he's got a whole little section for it. He's the worst sell-out of the bunch because he just takes it and takes it and feeds it back to everyone as quality.Schu wrote:Oh, they were implementing changes. Apparently, hunters and sandworms are part of a new section called the "grand finale"and winds of dune and paul of dune are now part of a section called heroes of dune
Baliset wrote:So it was not the prequels that established that machines conquered the humans.
I'm sure you can see where this is going?boardhead wrote:Nope. It never was.
DuneFishUK wrote:I always guessed the lack of posts over there was due to lack of boards to post on...
Usal420 wrote:there's really no subconscious depth to BH/KJA, but there is more fun. I wouldn't really try and compare the 2 FH vs BH/KJA, there is a lot of difference. FH seemed to have a message to impart, something that seeps in and never goes away. BH/KJA are just bringing back that universe, so you get more of the characters and story, which is very cool, just not any of the message, that's o k, Frank put enough in himself.
Baliset wrote:I don't mean to moderate here, but is this just another thread of the many that evolved into yet another FH vs BH/KJA thread?
OK, so what do we have here?boardadmin wrote:It happens. But we're being civil about it ...which is unique compared to other forums.
SandChigger wrote: He actually has the gall to criticize "other forums"?! (And you know exactly who he means by that ... but of course he can't say it because the name "Jacurutu" is one of those words he edits out, the stupid fuck!)
One of my all time favorites. There were a couple of weeks where he seemed to be completely out of the loop. Good work HLP for letting your mouthpiece on the internet twist in the wind like that.SandChigger wrote:Now THAT is one thing Byron Merritt IS actually good at.
(Remember Jessica To The Winds of Dune?)
Um, well, actually Thang has demonstrated how much more active this site is in terms of posts.Kickass Kwisatz wrote:Exactly! This is my main point against the arguments of people like Nebiros. What is so holy about FH's work that makes him infallible? I mean, I can think of a certain other bearded Dune writer who is much more of a Jesus-like figure in my mind. But I don't want to make this a religious argument.Xianghua wrote:Its only a few people, but seriously, Frank Herbert isn't Jesus or anything.
What I'm really getting at is how the original six books are relatively dull compared to the new adventures. I read them a long time ago once, but I've read Sandworms like twice! I'm in the middle of Winds right now, just got to the part where Bronso and Paul try to see the navigator. Very cool stuff, and it adds a lot to the character of Paul Atreides.
Xianghua wrote:Any more? You can just read your precious books by FH and ignore these. I'd like some of these people I've seen on Amazon.com to come over here. There're only like seven of them.
LOL @seven people! That pretty much settles it. Majority rules, the new Dune books rock! Hey, we should compare the site traffic on this board with wherever it is that they post, just to show them how truly pathetic their little "OH movement" is. Anyone know how to do that?
Or how about this, from another thread (FOR LOVERS OF BOTH CLASSIC DUNE AND THE PREQUELS » Question about dates (Butlerian Jihad)):Onasander wrote:I would hesitate to use occam's razon on anything, much less science fiction- it's not a function that yields results- if anything, occam's razor is a excuse to dodge the issue and should only be used in scenarios with excelling stupid people who can be mislead away from arguments with such a silly and useless tool. It's a hat trick, and if it's declared, I dislodge it forcefully to the shock and amazement of the declarer- no reason to play by it's rule- has no authentic place in discourse aiming for factual understanding as it is inherently a gamble on methodology- a shot into the unknown launched not in the hopes of being correct- but in the demand it is so. Only a fool could rely on that. [two subsequent paragraphs snipped]
Words fail me.Onasander wrote:Let it be known, AD is not AD as we know it, but rather, stands for 'After Douche'- a douche so terrible that existed in the far future that everyone decided to reject the old calendar (among man things), and focusing on the date of his death as dayone of the new calendar. It is not known how far apart the dune AD and our present day is separated..... all we can be sure of, is what a douchebag he must of been.