
Looks like they've had a snow on (off and on) up in Ohio for about two weeks now. Started snowing again on Xmas Eve and they had about an inch or two (with six inches expected total) by morning.
Over here we got sunshine and hurttight nipples.

Moderators: Omphalos, Freakzilla, ᴶᵛᵀᴬ
Or space whales?Hunchback Jack wrote:Or the squid of the moon?
HBJ
I knew Star Trek IV would've been based on a true story!SandChigger wrote:Keeeeewwwl!
(Can't wait to tell Marilyn about them!)
Paris is a bit like London. It's the only part of the country which counts. Watch out for Le Demon de Midi!lotek wrote:just to remind you and even people in Paris that France is slightly bigger than its capital, and while national media were crying their hearts out over the worst winter ever in 25 years(in truth the same as last year but hey gotta find an excuse why a bit of snow wrecked havoc), the French South was enjoying much more sunny weather.Freakzilla wrote:
– Wed Dec 8, 12:34 pm ET
PARIS (AFP) – Heavy snow briefly shut Charles de Gaulle-Roissy airport, paralysed the Paris bus network and forced the operators of the Eiffel Tower to close the landmark tourist attraction on Wednesday, officials said.
Motorists were warned that all motorways in the Paris region had become impassable and truckers were ordered to pull off the highways and wait until conditions improved.
The Interior Ministry said it had mobilised 5,000 paramilitary gendarmes, including 2,000 in the Paris area, to deal with traffic problems as roads were expected to become increasingly icy overnight.
French meteorological authorities said that 11 centimetres (over four inches) of snow fell on Paris on Wednesday, the most since 1987.
Roissy airport was closed for around an hour and a half, preventing around 100 flights taking off or landing, while workers tried to clear the runways of the heavy snow that began falling around midday, airport officials said.
One in five flights at Roissy had already been cancelled at the request of France's civil aviation authority (DGAC) due to the poor weather forecast.
The runways at Orly airport were earlier shut for about half an hour to allow workers to clear snow but there was no immediate information available on how flights at Paris' second airport were affected.
Only a handful of the 350 Paris bus routes were operating because of the snowfall in the capital, which had previously escaped the heavy snow affecting much of France since the start of the month.
The metro and overland suburban rail network were functioning normally.
The operators of the Eiffel Tower said they had already shut the first floor of the giant monument that is one of the world's most visited sites.
"But since late morning the Eiffel Tower has been completely closed and will certainly not reopen today," said a spokesman.
Salt cannot be used to fight snow or ice at the 324-metre (1,063-feet) tower because it would damage the iron structure that at this time of year gets around 12,000 visitors a day.
An early cold snap has caused severe transport disruption across Europe over the past week.
two pics taken the same day
this one ?chanilover wrote:Paris is a bit like London. It's the only part of the country which counts. Watch out for Le Demon de Midi!
One could not exist without the other.Drunken Idaho wrote:Hmm, can I formally request that we split this thread into two topics? "Climate" and "Weather" please.
I agree, and if you are protesting some SIG's use of "global warming" for whatever their agenda is,I don't care how much shit we burn it won't stop the next ice age.
I know that.SandRider wrote:![]()
I agree, and if you are protesting some SIG's use of "global warming" for whatever their agenda is,I don't care how much shit we burn it won't stop the next ice age.
neo-luddites who want to stop technology, third world governments and hippie communists who want
to either slow-down the industrial nations or atleast get some shakedown cash, NASA scientists at
budget time, the "wind-energy" factions who want to stop construction on a coal-fired plant, and so
forth, say that ....
putting up photos of snow in a Southern State in December is not a refutation of the major global climate change that is underway ....
Sorry, I didn't think I was being emotional.also, and god knows how many times I've tried to get this across to you, become more objective & less emotional in your politics ...
Look, I'm not against "green energy" or environmentalism or any of that hippie shit, that would be insane. But I do think there's a lot of fear being sold here and that were overestimating our impact on things. We've only been keeping climate records for a relatively short time and since I can't see it I'm not convinced. I'd like to hope we would burn up all the fossil fuel before we fuck the climate up beyond repair."global warming" is like the "race card" .... from a moralist viewpoint, it is a bad thing, not positive or of benefit to society; from a
political POV, it's just another tool, like radio ads, and Op-Ed pages and hookers with cameras .... I am a realist in that I understand
that the nature of human society is ultimately unsustainable, and has been since we set out on the road of cities and urban centers,
some fifteen thousand years ago ... and altho the exponential rate of technological advances indicate that the saturation point of human
societies on this planet is closer rather than farther, and closing in at an increased rate with every passing second, I'm pretty sure I'll
be dead when the thing starts collapsing, much less actually collapses, so I don't give a fuck .... and if that sounds selfish & such, well
of course it is, but the point is that this is the end result of the current path of human society, and nothing in the world can or will change
it ... so beating your head on the brick wall and wailing and gnashing teeth are useless ...
what is not useless is using these types of issues to further your own agenda in the present - the example I mentioned above is one that
is being used right now, and I support it - we finally got the okay from the State to construct a shit-load of new power distribution lines
in West Texas, which is an immediate Win for my boys, who are getting that Work, and was a Win for the international corporate
conglomerates that finance the construction of new windfarms who hold massive land leases out here for new projects, but can't
distribute all the power the existing farms are producing, and so can't greenlight new ones .... until the State okayed a coal-fired plant
up by Lubbock, again a Win for some of my boys who will get the construction work and one or two may end up with permanent employment;
new windfarms are shit out of luck, tho ... the coal-fired plant will eat all the new lines and then some ... and personally, while I think
windfarms are a waste of time and money, and not atall feasible for long-term power generation needs, I love the fuckers and want more ...
so when the lawyers went up to Lubbock for the hearings to talk bad about coal, I was right there with them, and when they started talking
about the environmental impact of coal, from the destruction and downstream disease from flat top mining to the air quality when burned, and
the impact of "Green House Gas Emissions", I nodded my old gray head sagely and hollered out "Right On, Brother!" like the good hippie
communist I am ....
is any of it true? who cares? this is politics and there is never any truth in politics; if there was, we'd never get anything done, and the
citizens would recoil in horror and there would be one armed revolution after another and we would fall into a state of perpetual anarchy ....
(which I am not against either, BTW ...)
It may be that I just read this when I was so young that it made more of an impact than it had rights to, but this pretty much sums up all of my thinking on the fear-mongering climate rhetoric.Michael Crichton in the novel Jurassic Park wrote: ...Malcolm said. "My point is that life on earth can take care of itself. In the thinking of a human being, a hundred years is a long time. A hundred years ago, we didn't have cars and airplanes and computers and vaccines..It was a whole different world. But to the earth, a hundred years is nothing. A million years is nothing. This planet lives and breathes on a much vaster scale. We can't imagine its slow and powerful rhythms, and we haven't got the humility to try. We have been residents here for the blink of an eye. If we are gone tomorrow, the earth will not miss us."
"And we very well might be gone," Hammond said, huffing.
"Yes," Malcolm said. "We might."
"So what are you saying? We shouldn't care about the environment?"
"No, of course not."
"Then what?"
Malcolm coughed, and stared into the distance. "Let's be clear. The planet is not in jeopardy. We are in jeopardy. We haven't got the power to destroy the planet - or save it. But we might have the power to save ourselves."
Okay, good. I was starting to worry about you... A lot of people really do get this wrong, and as an enviro-hippie who has been following global-warming science since before it was much of a political/media thing, that's extremely frustrating. Seriously, last winter (and I'm sure there will be more this winter) many of the big conservative pundits acted like smartasses saying that the planet is CLEARLY not in a warming state because they got some frostbite on their fat behinds.Freakzilla wrote:I know that.SandRider wrote:![]()
I agree, and if you are protesting some SIG's use of "global warming" for whatever their agenda is,I don't care how much shit we burn it won't stop the next ice age.
neo-luddites who want to stop technology, third world governments and hippie communists who want
to either slow-down the industrial nations or atleast get some shakedown cash, NASA scientists at
budget time, the "wind-energy" factions who want to stop construction on a coal-fired plant, and so
forth, say that ....
putting up photos of snow in a Southern State in December is not a refutation of the major global climate change that is underway ....