http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/commen ... l_in_1990/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
then, surfing "that place" just now, I found this:

Moderators: Omphalos, Freakzilla, ᴶᵛᵀᴬ
That it's OK to not blindly follow the charasmatic leader like a sheep.Ampoliros wrote:(@twitter thread) The president's speech to school children? Amazing, something KJA and I actually agree on. This shit is even more retarded than his books. These morons are actually getting pretty dangerous. Obama really needs to grow a spine on this and push back hard.
Requiring permission slips to have kids hear the presidents address? Seriously? Seriously? I think these parents should be forced to listen to it. You know some of them will show up at their kids schools to watch it and boo or shout it down. What message does that send to their kids?
May as well arrest Obama, too.FOX and these media pundits who are spreading fear are guilty of treason and sedition. Murdoch needs to be jailed as an enemy combatant. They are actively trying to manipulate the legislative process through scare tactics and terrorism. And for worse reasons, instead of (severely misguided) religious conviction they are doing it for money.
That's a good message to send to the kids.Watched a video of a woman with ALS being shouted down when she spoke about being afraid of losing her coverage and having her disease ruin her financially and begging for reform. ALS is what Stephen Hawking has.
This situation is getting out of control and Obama will be forced to use some authoritarian tactics just to put it down. Maybe its time to show these idiots what totalitarianism is all about.
My family moved away from new Orleans after Katrina. It worked for them. Wise man builds his house upon a rock.They sure don't seem to have a problem with socialized Police, Fire and Emergency services. Or should we just let the Free market solve the California wildfires the same way Bush let the free market save New Orleans?
Obama isn't subverting america?I bring this argument up here on a Dune forum because Dune was all about looking at Humanity on a long term basis. These bastards are subverting American Democracy for the shortest of short term plans. We cannot allow this to happen.
Radical ideas? The guy is so anti-radical he almost puts me to sleep sometimes. HC isn't radical, it's just common sense - right now might not be the time to do it, but radical it certainly aint.Freakzilla wrote:No, I don't believe Obama is a terrorist plant, but I do believe he has dangerously radical ideals.
Fucking up the HC for 300M people so 50M (or much, much less) can have government HC sounds radical to me, but that's not his only radical ideal.A Thing of Eternity wrote:Radical ideas? The guy is so anti-radical he almost puts me to sleep sometimes. HC isn't radical, it's just common sense - right now might not be the time to do it, but radical it certainly aint.Freakzilla wrote:No, I don't believe Obama is a terrorist plant, but I do believe he has dangerously radical ideals.
More americans are without healthcare than there are people in Canada. Not fantastic numbers, and a lot of people with healthcare get fucked over by it on a regular basis as far as I can see, and even if they're not one of the ones that gets outright fucked over, they get gouged. Our system works better.Freakzilla wrote:Fucking up the HC for 300M people so 50M (or much, much less) can have government HC sounds radical to me, but that's not his only radical ideal.A Thing of Eternity wrote:Radical ideas? The guy is so anti-radical he almost puts me to sleep sometimes. HC isn't radical, it's just common sense - right now might not be the time to do it, but radical it certainly aint.Freakzilla wrote:No, I don't believe Obama is a terrorist plant, but I do believe he has dangerously radical ideals.
WE HAVE HEALTH CARE!
How many times do I have to say I'm not against HC reform? That is not the same a government takeover.A Thing of Eternity wrote:More americans are without healthcare than there are people in Canada. Not fantastic numbers, and a lot of people with healthcare get fucked over by it on a regular basis as far as I can see, and even if they're not one of the ones that gets outright fucked over, they get gouged.Freakzilla wrote:Fucking up the HC for 300M people so 50M (or much, much less) can have government HC sounds radical to me, but that's not his only radical ideal.A Thing of Eternity wrote:Radical ideas? The guy is so anti-radical he almost puts me to sleep sometimes. HC isn't radical, it's just common sense - right now might not be the time to do it, but radical it certainly aint.Freakzilla wrote:No, I don't believe Obama is a terrorist plant, but I do believe he has dangerously radical ideals.
WE HAVE HEALTH CARE!
Like the towns with ONE doctor who do lottery drawings to see who gets care?Our system works better.
And again, I agree that now might be a totally piss poor time for attempting this reform, but the reform itself is not the problem, it's the timing, and possibly the method (you may be totally right that they should start with medicaid reform rather than their current ideas).
What's his other radial ideal, obeying international law when it comes to prisoners of war?
What's your source on that? We do first come first serve, with priority over that always given based on need. I've never heard otherwise.Freakzilla wrote:Like the towns with ONE doctor who do lottery drawings to see who gets care?Our system works better.
It was on the national news the other night, I don't remember which channel. The bigger problem was, the ONE doctor was about to retire and they can't find one to replace him.A Thing of Eternity wrote:What's your source on that? We do first come first serve, with priority over that always given based on need. I've never heard otherwise.Freakzilla wrote:Like the towns with ONE doctor who do lottery drawings to see who gets care?Our system works better.
Staffing can be a problem - especially depending on if you live in too capitalist a province (like mine). Don't get me wrong, our system has plenty of issues. Doesn't make it worse by a long shot.Freakzilla wrote:It was on the national news the other night, I don't remember which channel. The bigger problem was, the ONE doctor was about to retire and they can't find one to replace him.A Thing of Eternity wrote:What's your source on that? We do first come first serve, with priority over that always given based on need. I've never heard otherwise.Freakzilla wrote:Like the towns with ONE doctor who do lottery drawings to see who gets care?Our system works better.
Why can't there be both options?Regardless, I'd rather pay my big insurance company than have the US government take care of me.
THERE ARE! if you cannt afford you own, you can get medicare r medicaid. Why can't we just fix those?A Thing of Eternity wrote:Staffing can be a problem - especially depending on if you live in too capitalist a province (like mine). Don't get me wrong, our system has plenty of issues. Doesn't make it worse by a long shot.Freakzilla wrote:It was on the national news the other night, I don't remember which channel. The bigger problem was, the ONE doctor was about to retire and they can't find one to replace him.A Thing of Eternity wrote:What's your source on that? We do first come first serve, with priority over that always given based on need. I've never heard otherwise.Freakzilla wrote:Like the towns with ONE doctor who do lottery drawings to see who gets care?Our system works better.
But as for the whole lottery thing I call BS. I don't trust the media to have portayed the situation in anything even resembling reality, based on what I've seen in the media so far.Why can't there be both options?Regardless, I'd rather pay my big insurance company than have the US government take care of me.
Because it's good to hear both side, even if they're both crazy.EDIT TO ADD: I love our rediculous debates, I don't know why we bother though, neither of us is going to budge an inch, we're both too stubborn and biased.
WTF ? where's this coming from ?Freak wrote: federalization of education...
I'm all for expanding those programs to include others without insurance. I think it would be a lot less work. Then they could spend the time reforming those programs and setting up some regulations on the insurance companies.Freakzilla wrote: if you cannt afford you own, you can get medicare r medicaid. Why can't we just fix those?
I love this. Very nice way to make a point. Throwing his "Some people say" bullshit right back in his face. I love how the guy who wrote that article doesn't even get it.SandRider wrote:so this, and a variation of, has been bouncing around all day :
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/commen ... l_in_1990/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
then, surfing "that place" just now, I found this:
That's the main reason for my loathing of capitalism as it is today. I've been over it a couple times in thread alone. This idiotic capitalist notion that monetary profit can be infinite, is so stupidly short-sighted that Frank Herbert would barf. A lot of oil and insurance companies (and many others) might as well be Lexcorp. Destroying the environment and people's lives, sounds like evil master plans to me. But no, it's all protected in the name of "free enterprise," another god-given American right.Ampoliros wrote:I bring this argument up here on a Dune forum because Dune was all about looking at Humanity on a long term basis. These bastards are subverting American Democracy for the shortest of short term plans. We cannot allow this to happen.
Our system ain't perfect, but the US is the only industrialized nation without universal healthcare. And you don't hear about us, or any other countries trying to reform healthcare back to a privatized system. Why is that? Because it would be absurd. Did I mention that Tommy Douglas, the founder of universal healthcare in Canada, was recently voted The Greatest Canadian of All Time by a CBC poll? When has an insurance company ever recieved that praise of that caliber, besides their own commercials?Thing wrote:Our system is better.
ChumInWater said
September 4, 2009 at 7:12 PM
I hope nobody has updated Glenn Beck’s Wikipedia page to reflect these recent rape-murder rumors. I hope.
Whatever you do, do not go to either of the two main blogs on Glenn Beck’s web site (http://www.glennbeck.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) and bombard those poor people with annoying demands for facts and evidence of Glenn’s innocence. Please.
1234 said
September 4, 2009 at 9:48 pm
I know I’ll sound like an asshole, but I’m not even focusing on all of the thousands of people he’s already raped.
That shit already happened. Let’s focus on thwarting the rapes yet to come.
NOTfromtheLEFT said
September 4, 2009 at 8:09 PM
Glenn Beck has a more important agenda like protecting the Constitution than to respond to your homeroom rumor! You all are tools, I mean get a grip! I could only imagine how you would feel if somebody started a horrible rumor about each one of you at your place of employment because that person thought they were better than you so they retaliated with hateful rumors! And to be ignorant enough to demand an answer over a rumor! Such childish behavior.Here one for you, I think it was Teddy, you know after he flipped his car in the river with that passenger who was left scratching at the upholstery while drowning Teddy walked back to the mansion drunk, you’ve heard this before right? Well maybe that is when it took place and Glenn was never even there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Come on everybody lets start a new rumor! come on come on it’ll be fun I promi
Jim Gardner said
September 5, 2009 at 12:35 PM
Too Safe: When you say Glenn Beck raped and murdered a “woman” in 1990, is this new information? I had presumed for no reason whatsoever up until this point that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990. What you’re saying is that there was also a women involved. This is clearly a guy who hates all females. I’m not saying he a sexist, just that he has a problem with women.
AnotherFineMess said
September 5, 2009 at 7:18 PM
By the way, I’ve heard from a friend who is a webmaster that things are about to get really serious: Fox news are sending out C+D letters to just about anybody involved with this controversy. Basically anybody who has asked about what Glenn Beck did in 1990 is being told to hand over their domain name to Fox and never discuss Glenn Beck again.
JUST WHAT ARE THEY TRYING TO HIDE?
#
Dr Zen:
It would be wrong not to speculate that Glenn Beck raped a woman in 1990, although there’s absolutely no proof he didn’t.
#
SandRider:
I haven’t had this much fun on teh interwebs since the last Kevin J. Anderson interview. At first, I enjoyed seeing people expressing their disgust with Beck and his methods, and having a good laugh at his expense. Then, I just got rolled over by the way the right-wingers went nuts. Priceless. Finally, tho, and the best, has been in the last couple of days when the general American moron has stumbled in, totally oblivious to the joke itself. Thanks again, all you gimps & fags of 4chan, who thought this up & spread it around. >9000 internets4U.
BeckHayter said:
Instead of actually refuting the facts. I know. Not one person has come in here with a link to Glenn Beck’s murder record to prove that not one of them involved a rape and a girl in 1990.
shoulda put some of these in "the Challenge" ....4:12 PM True Believer wrote ...
If you really cared about women, Charlie, you would demand that Glenn Beck clear the air once and for all by making an official response to rumors that he raped and murdered a girl in 1990 while on a cocaine and alcohol binge. I don't claim to know the truth, but the topic should be discussed. Why won't Glenn Beck deny these allegations?
Freak, weren't you in the military? Did you ever get any benefits from that? Didn't the Govt. just help you with your house?Freakzilla wrote:It was on the national news the other night, I don't remember which channel. The bigger problem was, the ONE doctor was about to retire and they can't find one to replace him.A Thing of Eternity wrote:What's your source on that? We do first come first serve, with priority over that always given based on need. I've never heard otherwise.Freakzilla wrote:Like the towns with ONE doctor who do lottery drawings to see who gets care?Our system works better.
Regardless, I'd rather pay my big insurance company than have the US government take care of me.