SandChigger wrote:Again my point: why extend any courtesy to someone in your profession who is acting unprofessionally?
I don't consider someone a hack just because they've written or are writing in another's universe. It's the way they go about it that determines whether they're a hack or not.
Kevin J. Anderson is a hack.
I said why.
You never bad-mouthed another lawyer because the tables could be turned on you.
Being a hack is not "acting unprofessionally." Hacks are necessary to the liquidity of the publishing industry. The public is voracious for books, especially shitty ones with barely intelligible plots, asinine characters, and easy-to-overgeneralize concepts. We can thank god that assholes like Anderson built up an industry that can afford to take chances on new authors and even some established ones. After all, 95% of the idiots out there go for the low-hanging fruit. It's the rest of us who are smart enough to get ladders that get the good stuff that has not rotted on the branch, and the tender leaves.
I always go back and forth on this. I don't give Anderson more credit that he deserves, but I am a bit afraid of the future. I think that hes a moronic dipshit, but he's done his work by filling the appropriate niche. He's just pissed us off by wandering away from Star Wars, video-game-go-novel books and X-Files, by talking some other suspected moronic dipshits into allowing him to try and fail with something important. Unlucky roll of the dice for us, but Anderson certainly has not elevated himself from "symptom" to a "full fledged "problem" yet. Its not like his shit isn't going to disappear from the public discourse before the next generation comes along. At least I hope (and there is the dilemma, BTW).
God I hope he never wins an award.