inhuien

inhuien · Post by **inhuien** » 09 Feb 2008 14:55

Hi, Mark here, and I generally try to post avoiding non sequiturs when I can....mostly failing however.

SandChigger · Post by **SandChigger** » 10 Feb 2008 00:17

Quod non sequitur non interest.

inhuien · Post by **inhuien** » 10 Feb 2008 10:15

Quod erat demonstrandum.

SandChigger · Post by **SandChigger** » 10 Feb 2008 12:25

Consummatum est.

Post by **Omphalos** » 10 Feb 2008 12:44

Dictis Angle, Oepide!

SandChigger · Post by **SandChigger** » 10 Feb 2008 22:20

Eheu...Americani.

Remember that scene from The Life of Brian when the centurian takes the graffitist to task for his bad Latin?

Ahem.

Loquere Anglice! if you mean one or the other of us.
Loquimini Anglice! if you mean both. (Singular vs plural imperative)

Now write the one you meant 100 times, numbering them using Roman numerals.

Post by **Omphalos** » 10 Feb 2008 23:22

SandChigger wrote:Eheu...Americani.

Remember that scene from The Life of Brian when the centurian takes the graffitist to task for his bad Latin?

Ahem.

Loquere Anglice! if you mean one or the other of us.
Loquimini Anglice! if you mean both. (Singular vs plural imperative)

Now write the one you meant 100 times, numbering them using Roman numerals.

"The one you meant 100 times." OK now?

But I can still stand behind "Oepide."

SandChigger · Post by **SandChigger** » 11 Feb 2008 02:48

Omphalos wrote:"The one you meant 100 times." OK now?

No. The correct response was

The one you meant 100 times, numbering them using Roman numerals.

HA!

But I can still stand behind "Oepide."

I certainly wouldn't advise standing in front of him. Might have a flashback and confuse you with his father...nasty outcome likely, that.

(Sorry, Inhuien, we've quite derailed your personal thread.

)

inhuien · Post by **inhuien** » 11 Feb 2008 04:54

Please don't say sorry it's really no problem, anyway it's not as if it was a non sequitur;))

SandChigger · Post by **SandChigger** » 11 Feb 2008 08:52

We two do tend to get carried away.

(It's mostly him, though.

)

inhuien · Post by **inhuien** » 11 Feb 2008 09:20

teehee:)

Now you're not saying Big O's and bad effluence on you??

SandChigger · Post by **SandChigger** » 11 Feb 2008 09:37

Who, me? Never!

Post by **Omphalos** » 11 Feb 2008 10:08

flatulence?

SandChigger · Post by **SandChigger** » 11 Feb 2008 11:07

That was the fartest thing from my mind, I assure you!

Post by **Omphalos** » 11 Feb 2008 11:29

effluence? flatulence? Get it?

SandChigger · Post by **SandChigger** » 30 Jun 2009 22:18

Hey, inhuien!

I forgot to add this morning: just because a thing is not linked to, doesn't mean it's not there.

inhuien · Post by **inhuien** » 01 Jul 2009 10:12

Plans within plans

I'm not sure what this post means either.

inhuien · Post by **inhuien** » 01 Jul 2009 10:14

“They never blow but they suck!”

J A C U R U T U

inhuien

inhuien

HEY INHUIEN!

Re: inhuien

Re: inhuien