Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
Moderators: Omphalos, Freakzilla, ᴶᵛᵀᴬ
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: 10 Aug 2011 03:40
- Location: Manteca, CA.
Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
It's not as if the BG had anything of a qualified understanding of the prescience trap, of ancestral memory, or of counterfactuals and heavily extended political consequences; So, are the BG then the ultimate hypocrites for resenting and wishing to work against Paul and Leto II, who were more manipulative simply because they were capable of it?
Let's not forget that the BG shun their own "humanity" (or it may be more appropriate to say the aesthetic value of limitations and familiar/standardized human experiences), but they have an aversion to Leto II who was "guilty" of a magnified version of the same thing. They breed the human race they want, but they shun Leto II's Golden Path.
Let's not forget that the BG shun their own "humanity" (or it may be more appropriate to say the aesthetic value of limitations and familiar/standardized human experiences), but they have an aversion to Leto II who was "guilty" of a magnified version of the same thing. They breed the human race they want, but they shun Leto II's Golden Path.
The sentence below this is false.
The sentence above this is true.
The sentence above this is true.
- Freakzilla
- Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
- Posts: 18484
- Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Contact:
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
Excuse me? I'm not sure we're talking about the same Bene Gesserit.lukecash12 wrote:It's not as if the BG had anything of a qualified understanding of the prescience trap, of ancestral memory, or of counterfactuals and heavily extended political consequences;
You really think that was Paul and Leto's motivation, because they could?So, are the BG then the ultimate hypocrites for resenting and wishing to work against Paul and Leto II, who were more manipulative simply because they were capable of it?
I think everyone but Hwi had an aversion to him.Let's not forget that the BG shun their own "humanity" (or it may be more appropriate to say the aesthetic value of limitations and familiar/standardized human experiences), but they have an aversion to Leto II who was "guilty" of a magnified version of the same thing.
He was abomination, how do we know the GP is not just a bigger prescient trap?They breed the human race they want, but they shun Leto II's Golden Path.
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman
- lotek
- Posts: 5784
- Joined: 28 Jul 2009 08:33
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
lukecash12 wrote:It's not as if the BG had anything of a qualified understanding of the prescience trap, of ancestral memory, or of counterfactuals and heavily extended political consequences; So, are the BG then the ultimate hypocrites for resenting and wishing to work against Paul and Leto II, who were more manipulative simply because they were capable of it?
Let's not forget that the BG shun their own "humanity" (or it may be more appropriate to say the aesthetic value of limitations and familiar/standardized human experiences), but they have an aversion to Leto II who was "guilty" of a magnified version of the same thing. They breed the human race they want, but they shun Leto II's Golden Path.
Peter Griffin wrote:You're doing the same thing that Mia Farrow did to that Oriental guy that Woody Allen brought home from the circus.
Family Guy Barely LegalLois wrote:Peter, hold on to that thought cause I'm going to explain to you when we get home all the things that are wrong with that statement.
Spice is the worm's gonads.
- Not_Your_Friend
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010 10:39
- Location: Toronto, CANADA
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
I think the point he was trying to make is not a 'because they could' motivation, but that the BG are only less manipulative than Paul and Leto II because they weren't as powerful.Freakzilla wrote:You really think that was Paul and Leto's motivation, because they could?lukecash12 wrote:So, are the BG then the ultimate hypocrites for resenting and wishing to work against Paul and Leto II, who were more manipulative simply because they were capable of it?
- Freakzilla
- Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
- Posts: 18484
- Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Contact:
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
Yes, but that is not why the BG were against Paul and Leto. They were against Paul because he was a tyrant who slaughtered billions and against Leto because people didn't need the BGs political expertise under his reign.Not_Your_Friend wrote:I think the point he was trying to make is not a 'because they could' motivation, but that the BG are only less manipulative than Paul and Leto II because they weren't as powerful.Freakzilla wrote:You really think that was Paul and Leto's motivation, because they could?lukecash12 wrote:So, are the BG then the ultimate hypocrites for resenting and wishing to work against Paul and Leto II, who were more manipulative simply because they were capable of it?
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman
- A Thing of Eternity
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
- Location: Calgary Alberta
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
The BG had a deep understanding of Ancestral Memory and political consequences over extremely long periods, look at the Missionaria Protectiva - not really sure where you were going with those.
But yes, I do agree that they failed to really grasp what Leto II did for them in the later books.
But yes, I do agree that they failed to really grasp what Leto II did for them in the later books.

- Freakzilla
- Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
- Posts: 18484
- Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Contact:
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
Even if Leto's GP was "right" it was out of their control and I think that is what essentially scared them about it.
As with every report preceding this one, we must address the Lord Leto's
prescience. There is no doubt that his ability to predict future events, an
oracular ability much more powerful than that of any ancestor, is still the
mainstay of his political control.
We do not defy it!
It is our belief that he knows every important action we take far in advance of
the event. We guide ourselves, therefore, by the rule that we will not knowingly
threaten either his person or such of his grand plan as we can discern. Our
address to him will continue to be:
"Tell us if we threaten you that we may desist."
And:
"Tell us of your grand plan that we may help."
He has provided no new answers to either question during this period.
~GEoD
As with every report preceding this one, we must address the Lord Leto's
prescience. There is no doubt that his ability to predict future events, an
oracular ability much more powerful than that of any ancestor, is still the
mainstay of his political control.
We do not defy it!
It is our belief that he knows every important action we take far in advance of
the event. We guide ourselves, therefore, by the rule that we will not knowingly
threaten either his person or such of his grand plan as we can discern. Our
address to him will continue to be:
"Tell us if we threaten you that we may desist."
And:
"Tell us of your grand plan that we may help."
He has provided no new answers to either question during this period.
~GEoD
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman
- A Thing of Eternity
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
- Location: Calgary Alberta
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
Hard to say for sure though whether that was actually what they felt, or if that was them apeasing him in an attempt to simply survive his rule. Probably a bit of both honestly, knowing them and knowing FH.
I did get the impression in the later books though that they never did really understand the Golden Path. I could be wrong about that though, it's been a while since I've read those two.
I did get the impression in the later books though that they never did really understand the Golden Path. I could be wrong about that though, it's been a while since I've read those two.

- Not_Your_Friend
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010 10:39
- Location: Toronto, CANADA
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
Those are both part of it, but too simplistic I think. For all the BG's long term planning and deep thinking, they appear to be very childish in thinking that they are the only ones who know what humanity needs.Freakzilla wrote:Not_Your_Friend wrote:Yes, but that is not why the BG were against Paul and Leto. They were against Paul because he was a tyrant who slaughtered billions and against Leto because people didn't need the BGs political expertise under his reign.
With Paul they were just bitter that 'their' KH was out of their control. The fact that he threw everything back in their faces, stared out at them from the dark place and took his own road had as much to do with any other reason they were against him.
For Leto, even a millenia and a half wasn't enough time for the BG to understand the sacrifices He made for humanity. He was still just 'The Tyrant.' His strict monopoly on spice distribution probably made the BG think that He was attemping to suffocate them into being merely Museum BG.
- lotek
- Posts: 5784
- Joined: 28 Jul 2009 08:33
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
you need to learn to quote.Not_Your_Friend wrote:Those are both part of it, but too simplistic I think. For all the BG's long term planning and deep thinking, they appear to be very childish in thinking that they are the only ones who know what humanity needs.Freakzilla wrote:Not_Your_Friend wrote:Yes, but that is not why the BG were against Paul and Leto. They were against Paul because he was a tyrant who slaughtered billions and against Leto because people didn't need the BGs political expertise under his reign.
With Paul they were just bitter that 'their' KH was out of their control. The fact that he threw everything back in their faces, stared out at them from the dark place and took his own road had as much to do with any other reason they were against him.
For Leto, even a millenia and a half wasn't enough time for the BG to understand the sacrifices He made for humanity. He was still just 'The Tyrant.' His strict monopoly on spice distribution probably made the BG think that He was attemping to suffocate them into being merely Museum BG.
Spice is the worm's gonads.
- Freakzilla
- Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
- Posts: 18484
- Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Contact:
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
I think you underestimate the BG.Not_Your_Friend wrote:Those are both part of it, but too simplistic I think. For all the BG's long term planning and deep thinking, they appear to be very childish in thinking that they are the only ones who know what humanity needs.Freakzilla wrote:Yes, but that is not why the BG were against Paul and Leto. They were against Paul because he was a tyrant who slaughtered billions and against Leto because people didn't need the BGs political expertise under his reign.
With Paul they were just bitter that 'their' KH was out of their control. The fact that he threw everything back in their faces, stared out at them from the dark place and took his own road had as much to do with any other reason they were against him.
For Leto, even a millenia and a half wasn't enough time for the BG to understand the sacrifices He made for humanity. He was still just 'The Tyrant.' His strict monopoly on spice distribution probably made the BG think that He was attemping to suffocate them into being merely Museum BG.
Yes, I'm sure Paul hurt their pride but I think you assume they were doing what they were doing "for the sake of humanity". I think the point of the KH was for the BG to seize power and step out from behind the scenes. Only THEN could they concentrate unhindered on shepherding humanity.
The BG obvioulsy knew Leto had a grand plan and the fact that he spared them at all indicated that they would have an important role to play in it.
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman
- Not_Your_Friend
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010 10:39
- Location: Toronto, CANADA
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
Wow. I know, right? I swear I have it figured out on other forums.lotek wrote:you need to learn to quote.
- Not_Your_Friend
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010 10:39
- Location: Toronto, CANADA
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
I'm not sure I understand. Were they not doing things for the sake of humanity, or were they trying to shepherd it?Freakzilla wrote:I think you underestimate the BG.
Yes, I'm sure Paul hurt their pride but I think you assume they were doing what they were doing "for the sake of humanity". I think the point of the KH was for the BG to seize power and step out from behind the scenes. Only THEN could they concentrate unhindered on shepherding humanity.
It still didn't stop them from single-mindedly thinking him nothing more than a tyrant, and cursing Jessica's name for giving birth to Paul and starting the whole thing.Freakzilla wrote:The BG obvioulsy knew Leto had a grand plan and the fact that he spared them at all indicated that they would have an important role to play in it.
- Freakzilla
- Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
- Posts: 18484
- Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Contact:
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
What do you think their intention for the KH was? The imperial throne, of course.Not_Your_Friend wrote:I'm not sure I understand. Were they not doing things for the sake of humanity, or were they trying to shepherd it?Freakzilla wrote:I think you underestimate the BG.
Yes, I'm sure Paul hurt their pride but I think you assume they were doing what they were doing "for the sake of humanity". I think the point of the KH was for the BG to seize power and step out from behind the scenes. Only THEN could they concentrate unhindered on shepherding humanity.
When my father, the Padishah Emperor, heard of Duke Leto's death and the manner
of it, he went into such a rage as we had never before seen. He blamed my mother
and the compact forced on him to place a Bene Gesserit on the throne...
~Dune
I don't undestand why you think they thought so simply of Leto II.Not_Your_Friend wrote:It still didn't stop them from single-mindedly thinking him nothing more than a tyrant, and cursing Jessica's name for giving birth to Paul and starting the whole thing.Freakzilla wrote:The BG obvioulsy knew Leto had a grand plan and the fact that he spared them at all indicated that they would have an important role to play in it.
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman
- Not_Your_Friend
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010 10:39
- Location: Toronto, CANADA
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
They didn't need a KH for the throne. They could have taken the throne at any time through manipulations. The KH could always come later.Freakzilla wrote:What do you think their intention for the KH was? The imperial throne, of course.
Admittedly it's been a few years since I read Heretics and Chapterhouse, but there didn't seem to all that much understanding that he had made an huge sacrifice for the GP; just 'Tyrant' this and cursing Jessica that. It wasn't until Odrade finds the message that there finally appears to be an understanding that there was something bigger at stake than the BG and their petty spice rations, and even then it was grudgingly.Freakzilla wrote:I don't undestand why you think they thought so simply of Leto II.
Like that annoying bitch Siona, "Wah, I understand the Golden Path now but I still hate you because you're mean, wah."
- Ampoliros
- Posts: 2518
- Joined: 14 Mar 2008 11:22
- Location: I think we took a wrong turn...
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
A single BG might not see it, but a full reverend mother, especially the inner circle had an inkling of what it was to be Leto II
Leto II is equivalent to the BG as a whole. While they might not fully understand what it meant, I think because of their unique position they could conceptualize what it was like.
I'm certain that they respected the difference.
Leto II is equivalent to the BG as a whole. While they might not fully understand what it meant, I think because of their unique position they could conceptualize what it was like.
I'm certain that they respected the difference.
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus
- Freakzilla
- Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
- Posts: 18484
- Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Contact:
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
More accurately, I'd say the BG as a whole were equal to less than half a Leto since no RM had male ancestral memories.Ampoliros wrote:A single BG might not see it, but a full reverend mother, especially the inner circle had an inkling of what it was to be Leto II
Leto II is equivalent to the BG as a whole. While they might not fully understand what it meant, I think because of their unique position they could conceptualize what it was like.
I'm certain that they respected the difference.
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman
- Ampoliros
- Posts: 2518
- Joined: 14 Mar 2008 11:22
- Location: I think we took a wrong turn...
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
That and they didn't have prescience anywhere near what Leto had.
Hence the qualification that they could conceptualize Leto without fully understanding him. They were well aware of most of what differentiated them from him. Perhaps I should have said 'similar' rather than equivalent.
Hence the qualification that they could conceptualize Leto without fully understanding him. They were well aware of most of what differentiated them from him. Perhaps I should have said 'similar' rather than equivalent.
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus
- merkin muffley
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: 23 Apr 2010 15:18
- Location: War Room
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
You have reached new heights of sophistry which I only presumed could be attained by the Betwixt Books.lukecash12 wrote:It's not as if the BG had anything of a qualified understanding of the prescience trap, of ancestral memory, or of counterfactuals and heavily extended political consequences; So, are the BG then the ultimate hypocrites for resenting and wishing to work against Paul and Leto II, who were more manipulative simply because they were capable of it?
Let's not forget that the BG shun their own "humanity" (or it may be more appropriate to say the aesthetic value of limitations and familiar/standardized human experiences), but they have an aversion to Leto II who was "guilty" of a magnified version of the same thing. They breed the human race they want, but they shun Leto II's Golden Path.
- SadisticCynic
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: 07 Apr 2009 09:28
- Location: In Time or in Space?
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
I think Not_Your_Friend is right that the BG didn't have much fondness for Paul or Leto, but it wasn't that they hated Leto's goals so much as hated having control of their own organisation removed from them.
We should remember also that some factions (if not all) of the BG are deathly afraid of even the hint of a suggestion of a KH returning. That would have to have some explanation i.e. the complete disruption he could wreak on the BG.
We should remember also that some factions (if not all) of the BG are deathly afraid of even the hint of a suggestion of a KH returning. That would have to have some explanation i.e. the complete disruption he could wreak on the BG.
Ah English, the language where pretty much any word can have any meaning! - A Thing of Eternity
- SandChigger
- KJASF Ground Zero
- Posts: 14492
- Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
- Location: A continuing state of irritation
- Contact:
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
Kalam farigh.lukecash12 wrote:It's not as if the BG had anything of a qualified understanding of the prescience trap, of ancestral memory, or of counterfactuals and heavily extended political consequences; So, are the BG then the ultimate hypocrites for resenting and wishing to work against Paul and Leto II, who were more manipulative simply because they were capable of it?
Let's not forget that the BG shun their own "humanity" (or it may be more appropriate to say the aesthetic value of limitations and familiar/standardized human experiences), but they have an aversion to Leto II who was "guilty" of a magnified version of the same thing. They breed the human race they want, but they shun Leto II's Golden Path.
"Let the dead give water to the dead. As for me, it's NO MORE FUCKING TEARS!"
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: 10 Aug 2011 03:40
- Location: Manteca, CA.
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
Precisely. The BG were hypocritical, which is what this thread is about. I can certainly agree with all of you that the BG had a whole bunch of reasons to dislike Leto II, but the fact remains that they were hypocrites. However much of an abomination he was, they would have done the same. Leto II was the perfect expression of their ideology, that he was willing to do anything and outlast anything for the survival and propogation of humanity.Not_Your_Friend wrote:I think the point he was trying to make is not a 'because they could' motivation, but that the BG are only less manipulative than Paul and Leto II because they weren't as powerful.Freakzilla wrote:You really think that was Paul and Leto's motivation, because they could?lukecash12 wrote:So, are the BG then the ultimate hypocrites for resenting and wishing to work against Paul and Leto II, who were more manipulative simply because they were capable of it?
Don't forget that the BG's own Golden Path created a class of barbaric people called the Landsraad.
The sentence below this is false.
The sentence above this is true.
The sentence above this is true.
- SandChigger
- KJASF Ground Zero
- Posts: 14492
- Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
- Location: A continuing state of irritation
- Contact:
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
lukecash12 wrote:Don't forget that the BG's own Golden Path created a class of barbaric people called the Landsraad.

"Let the dead give water to the dead. As for me, it's NO MORE FUCKING TEARS!"
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2993
- Joined: 17 Feb 2008 18:44
- Location: Den Haag - The Netherlands
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
... this is three strikes out. Who are your really?lukecash12 wrote:Don't forget that the BG's own Golden Path created a class of barbaric people called the Landsraad.
"... the mystery of life isn't a problem to solve but a reality to experience."
“There is no escape—we pay for the violence of our ancestors.”
Sandrider: "Keith went to Bobo's for a weekend of drinking, watched some DVDs,
and wrote a Dune Novel."
“There is no escape—we pay for the violence of our ancestors.”
Sandrider: "Keith went to Bobo's for a weekend of drinking, watched some DVDs,
and wrote a Dune Novel."
- lotek
- Posts: 5784
- Joined: 28 Jul 2009 08:33
Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?
that was goodlukecash12 wrote:Precisely. The BG were hypocritical, which is what this thread is about. I can certainly agree with all of you that the BG had a whole bunch of reasons to dislike Leto II, but the fact remains that they were hypocrites. However much of an abomination he was, they would have done the same. Leto II was the perfect expression of their ideology, that he was willing to do anything and outlast anything for the survival and propogation of humanity.
that was badlukecash12 wrote:Don't forget that the BG's own Golden Path created a class of barbaric people called the Landsraad.
Spice is the worm's gonads.