First, the poo-poo defense on Arrakeen.
(I specifically pointed out in a post on Arrakken the hyprocisy of his statement that the OH's didn't want to discuss the issues, when he had just finished a pogrom of post deletions and banning members to which he responded by not responding except that I was a poo-poo.)
Now, the cyperstalker defense!
Before it gets out of hand...?Byron wrote:Hi Freak. The above link is an example of laws being passed in light of such online activities. I don’t want to sound like I’m whining, but this has got to stop somehow, somewhere, before it gets out of hand. Thanks for listening.
Um, putting other legal implications aside for the moment, before what gets out of hand, the general public becomes aware of the marketing fraud behind the new books?
Well, thanks Byron for responding to the name calling and so dramatically validating Loremaster's earlier post:
Byron wrote:Don't know how many times I need to say this; guess it still hasn't sunk in, so I'll repeat it here
loremaster wrote:I have to admit, Byron never seems to respond to a single valid criticism, preferring to jump on the several posts which instead can be answered (usually by squealing "Flame Bait", or crying to Mods, or similar).
WITHOUT (and this is important) noticing that the only reason flame-baiting occurs (and all the general hilarity of the insults) is because he doesn't answer the legit posts.