Page 1 of 1

Sexual Imprinting/Enslavement: Any Basis In Fact?

Posted: 21 Apr 2008 14:38
by HoosierDaddy
One of my favorite FH ideas BTW.

Now for all of you human sexuality experts, are there any known factual concepts that FH borrowed from to come up with the idea? For instance, do any the following things really make sense:

1. "Marking" the subject prior to the imprint.
2. Humming as an "intensifier"(?).
3. Certain nerve pathways that when stimulated would act as a super erotic zone.
4. Extending male/female orgasm into multiple waves.

Not having studied Tantric techniques, or taken any classes on the subject, did FH just dream this stuff up, or is there some hard science that we could penetrate into here?

:?

Re: Sexual Imprinting/Enslavement: Any Basis In Fact?

Posted: 21 Apr 2008 14:51
by Spicelon
HoosierDaddy wrote:or is there some hard science that we could penetrate into here?

:?
Nice. :D

I bet you there's some Kama Sutra or Tantric basis to FH's ideas on this, but I couldn't say for sure. I'm all for sex, but at my age I doubt even an 18 year old hardbody could reduce me to a wimpering sex slave.

Well...let me back up a bit there. ;)
Sex as a means for controlling the masses? I just don't see it.

Re: Sexual Imprinting/Enslavement: Any Basis In Fact?

Posted: 21 Apr 2008 16:14
by Omphalos
Spicelon wrote:..but at my age I doubt even an 18 year old hardbody could reduce me to a wimpering sex slave.
That's because 18 year old hard bodies don't know shit. But don't worry, you will eventually meet the right girl for you. :wink:

Re: Sexual Imprinting/Enslavement: Any Basis In Fact?

Posted: 21 Apr 2008 16:41
by Spicelon
Omphalos wrote:
Spicelon wrote:..but at my age I doubt even an 18 year old hardbody could reduce me to a wimpering sex slave.
That's because 18 year old hard bodies don't know shit. But don't worry, you will eventually meet the right girl for you. :wink:
Hey man, my GF cums when the wind blows. I GOT IT MADE, SUCKAS!!

Posted: 21 Apr 2008 17:45
by orald
As for multiple/lengthy orgasms, I think that's what tantric sex is claiming to be able to do, no? I'm not sure "orgasm" translates directly to "ejaculation" since males are more limited in that area.

Humming...well, it's not really like Waff's humming as I see it but more of a...whispery thing(hard to explain). They're not immitating bees there.

Nerve pathways etc- well, it's known lots of areas are very sensitive to help sexual arousal. Nipples, genitalia, lips, anus etc.
All it means is "if you rub it he will come". :wink:

As for control though, I can't see that in RL.

Sure, Mandy has me on a leash here with her sexuallity, but that's not the same. :P

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 02:05
by chanilover
I think Frank was inspired by his new wife at the time he wrote those books.

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 03:01
by orald
:shock:

I gotta try one of those then! Maybe Kim has inherited her...skills? :D

Re: Sexual Imprinting/Enslavement: Any Basis In Fact?

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 03:02
by SandChigger
Spicelon wrote:Hey man, my GF cums when the wind blows.
:shock:

I'm sure that's indicative of some kind of physiological abnormality...at least.

(Anyway, thanks for not going into scat details.)

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 03:06
by SandChigger
orald wrote::shock:

I gotta try one of those then! Maybe Kim has inherited her...skills? :D
Um...wrong line of descent.

Theresa was the new wife (No. 3). Beverly was Kim's grandmother. (Kim is Brian's daughter.)

Got it?

(For completeness: Byron is a son of Penny, Frank's daughter by his first wife, Flora Parkinson.)

:)

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 03:11
by orald
Oh, I thought he meant Beverly.

I know FH loved Beverly dearly, but all we got through her was the Hack. :?

I'm still up for checking out Kim though. :wink:

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 03:14
by SandChigger
I shoulda gone ahead and Friended her on MySpace. Maybe then I'd know what she looks like.

Hopefully she favors her mother. (Not that I've seen any pix of Jan. She's elusive. Like Bigfoot or the Yeti.)

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 03:20
by orald
chigger wrote:She's elusive. Like Bigfoot or the Yeti.
And probably as hairy, from the attention her hubby gives his favorite hiker hack. :lol:

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 05:43
by SandChigger
I don't know. My chiggy sense is that she's more than just a beard. ;)

On the topic here....

We have to keep in mind that these are people about 25,000 years from now...so there's probably been a bit of evolution or intentional tinkering between now and then. :wink:

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 10:00
by Tleilax Master B
Evolution, schmevolution. We're freaking slaves now. That's why half of us are married. :(

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 11:33
by SandChigger
A ha ha ha ha! :D

:shock:

Ahem.

"So...you wanna get married?"

"Whoa...look at that!"

"Hey, where you goin'?"

"Just remembered we're outa bread. Be back in a bit...."

WHOOOSH!

The "Just Stepping Out For A Loaf O' Bread" Slip. Works every time. 8)

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 11:35
by HoosierDaddy
Maybe this local cable TV video can give us some clues (language is NSFW):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaoRUOYEEfs

BTW, the older women on the left is her mother. :P [/url]

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 16:55
by chanilover
Yes, it's all down to his new wife of the time. After being married to Beverly for ages, Frank must have had a bit of a turn when he started shagging someone new.

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 20:06
by orald
Blasphemy! :shock: Kill the blasphemer! :x

Posted: 23 Apr 2008 12:51
by Mr. Teg
SandChigger wrote:
orald wrote::shock:

I gotta try one of those then! Maybe Kim has inherited her...skills? :D
Um...wrong line of descent.

Theresa was the new wife (No. 3). Beverly was Kim's grandmother. (Kim is Brian's daughter.)

Got it?

(For completeness: Byron is a son of Penny, Frank's daughter by his first wife, Flora Parkinson.)

:)
Oh, now "you made Byron cry!" :cry: :wink:

You know he doesn't like us discussing these sensitive family issues :roll: in public.