Posted: 29 Mar 2008 20:37
36 1/2 year in the U.S.Mandy wrote:All you need to do is relax and stop assuming everyone is picking on you. I find it hard to believe that you've lived to be 30 with such thin skin.
I am 49
I am 49
Jᴀᴄᴜʀᴜᴛᴜ - Tʜᴇ Cᴀsᴛ Oᴜᴛ
DUNE DISCUSSION FORUM FOR ORTHODOX HERBERTARIANS
http://www.jacurutu.com/
Abbreviations
Page 2 of 3
I am 49
Posted: 29 Mar 2008 20:40
Well I can at least confirm that I've never picked on anyone here at Jacurutu. I actually haven't a clue what is supposedly going wrong in this thread.
Posted: 29 Mar 2008 20:40
Posted: 29 Mar 2008 20:44
I don't know either.. except I guess we shouldn't joke about toilet paper. INTERNET SERIOUS BUSINESS!GamePlayer wrote:Well I can at least confirm that I've never picked on anyone here at Jacurutu. I actually haven't a clue what is supposedly going wrong in this thread.
Posted: 29 Mar 2008 21:16
Posted: 29 Mar 2008 21:33
Tsk, tsk, what happened to old monogamy, where one man and another man make pure, simple love?
Oh, I mean a man and a woman...
Oh, I mean a man and a woman...
Posted: 29 Mar 2008 21:39
Are you sure you didn't mean
man and woman?
a man and woman?
man and a woman?
a man and a woman?
man and the woman?
the man and a woman?
...
man and woman?
a man and woman?
man and a woman?
a man and a woman?
man and the woman?
the man and a woman?
...
Posted: 29 Mar 2008 23:13
A double standard exists @ times from a selected very few.GamePlayer wrote:Well I can at least confirm that I've never picked on anyone here at Jacurutu. I actually haven't a clue what is supposedly going wrong in this thread.
again, I have gotten help from most without bull shit added on.
I do not like bull shit.
some member love it though.
sorry game player, Fantomas.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008 00:33
Oh...my...God...
Wiki Wiki wow
Posted: 30 Mar 2008 08:29
Is that all it is? *groan*Mandy wrote:I don't know either.. except I guess we shouldn't joke about toilet paper. INTERNET SERIOUS BUSINESS!
fantomas wrote:A double standard exists @ times from a selected very few.
again, I have gotten help from most without bull shit added on.
I do not like bull shit.
some member love it though.
sorry game player, Fantomas.
Well, perhaps a break from the whole subject would be in order. Just go about replying to other members or subjects. It's definitely not worth getting all worked up. Cooler heads will prevail.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008 08:36
Always educational. I find rational, medical descriptions of sex amusing. It's such a disassociated and minimalist description of the affair that it makes me laugh. It's like trying to define a good orgasm when your heart skips beats and your eyes are rolling back. The encyclopedia reduces it to "the subject experiences a sensation of pleasure" like that comes anywhere near to describing the experienceRakis wrote:Oh...my...God...
Wiki Wiki wow
Posted: 30 Mar 2008 09:29
Words fail to describe quite alot.
I'm quite sure God Leto or someone else makes that point somewhere in the books.
I'm quite sure God Leto or someone else makes that point somewhere in the books.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008 11:02
Thank You,GamePlayer wrote: It's definitely not worth getting all worked up.
SIMÓN.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008 11:38
Somebody needs a nap!
Posted: 30 Mar 2008 16:14
That...or lay off the dope(which someone has claimed to have been using while posting a rather colorful post not so long ago).Freakzilla wrote:Somebody needs a nap!
What's that, Freak, dope-heads shouldn't be shot? Now you see why I say it?
Posted: 30 Mar 2008 22:53
Hey! This could be the result of a lack of drugs...like spice coffeeorald wrote:That...or lay off the dopeFreakzilla wrote:Somebody needs a nap!
Posted: 30 Mar 2008 23:07
Self-hatred because you're not cool enough to score any drugs yourself?orald wrote:dope-heads shouldn't be shot? Now you see why I say it?
Posted: 31 Mar 2008 07:51
All things in moderation, my friend.orald wrote:That...or lay off the dope(which someone has claimed to have been using while posting a rather colorful post not so long ago).Freakzilla wrote:Somebody needs a nap!
What's that, Freak, dope-heads shouldn't be shot? Now you see why I say it?
Posted: 31 Mar 2008 13:25
So if I change my words to "some dope-head should be shot", it's moderate and OK?
Posted: 31 Mar 2008 18:06
Yep. Especially if we're thinking of the same one.
And I know we are.
And I know we are.
Posted: 31 Mar 2008 18:25
Argh, Freudian(sp?) mishap, I meant to say "dope-heads", in plural. Honest.
Posted: 31 Mar 2008 18:54
I don't think shooting anyone is moderate.orald wrote:So if I change my words to "some dope-head should be shot", it's moderate and OK?
Posted: 31 Mar 2008 21:20
Lets settle on tearing off body parts...like heads. Heads are body parts.
Posted: 01 Apr 2008 03:41
I think you're moving in the wrong direction on the violence-affection scale.
Posted: 01 Apr 2008 10:10
And I think you're a damn hippy tree-hugger! 