its one of the cheapest of dishonest dodges to avoid the subject with blanket statements about bushes ignorance or the governments incompetence.
our system is stacked in favor of individuals using public assets in toward of private ends.
col fletcher prouty gives the best explaination of this process and its workings
he was an airforce pilot who flew fdr to tehran to meet stalin and churchill
google sheep-dipping and specialteams
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 18 Jan 2013 23:24
by Eyes High
Jabecca wrote:
Eyes High wrote:I think Papa Bear is just pulling our legs.
Yes, he certainly is!
Papa Bear wants his milk and honey!
A ton of fun!
He's MY Papa Bear NOT yours. Only I get away with calling him that.
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 18 Jan 2013 23:27
by Robspierre
No, it's actually called ignoring the question and it is a common tactic in speeches and presentations. The fact that you can't see past your own blinders to the spirit of the post as opposed to actually giving a fuck about the topic shows a continued pattern of wilful ignorance as to the purpose of Ghafla.
Plus, I cannot take anyone seriously with such utter disregard for the rudiments of writing, ee cummings, you are not.
Rob
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 18 Jan 2013 23:40
by distrans
not willful!
simply ignorance
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 00:53
by distrans
so,
if bush and company had come out and said "ya, we did it... had a good reason"
it would of, in terms of deaths and destruction, been a minor footnote in comparison to what all else they had been responsible for and openly proud about
why the fuss?
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 03:17
by lotek
You people are crazy.
But I like you.
First statement doesn't apply to Eyes, the second one doesn't apply to everyone else.
Now I'm gonna shoot some aliens, at least I hope that'ss what they are.
Damn squirrels.
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 03:24
by Omphalos
SandRider wrote:wow, you're not any better @ TAKING ORDERS & FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS
than that freak-giant in Sacramento .... (no offense, Omph ... All Hail Ming, &etc.)
the only thing I hate worse than Yankees & the HLP are COCKBLOCKers !!
when I hit "submit", godsdammit, I expect to see my IMPORTANT OPINIONS
pubished mutha-fucken IMMEDIATELY ... not some "in the meantime, while you
were typing and composing an EPIC POST in an EPIC THREAD" some OTHER cocksucker
had something to post ....
fuck you, 'trans, you be on my LAST NERVE ....
I am the Alien Underlord around here.
And fuck me if I don't have an inquisitive mind and a bullshit allergy.
SandRider wrote:
San Angelo, Texas
That is one motherfucker of a gerrymandered county you have there. You have anything to do with that?
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 04:43
by Jabecca
Omphalos wrote:
I am the Alien Underlord around here...and fuck me
Hutts are hermaphrodites meaning they have both sexual organs but can only assume either a male of female role at one time.
I didn't know that.
The mystery unravels.
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 08:33
by SandRider
oh .... okay .... I get in now ....
my late-nite drunken ramblings are amusing & perfectly acceptable,
as long as I'm attacking some irrelevant low-level SciFi hack over some
irrelevant comic books, or posting long, unread diatribes in the Amazon
Basement &etc
but, step out-of-line & point out the glaring holes in the 9/11 Commission Report,
and suddenly I'm the shitheel ....
it's been over 11 years, none this is "new" information, these are not
"new" radical ideas ... if you are not familiar with the points raised by the
"9/11 Truth Movement", if you have no questions in your mind whatsoever
about those events, nothing I could possibly post on this backwater forum
will change that .... not that I would wish to .... I merely offered to answer any
questions ... if y'all have none, if you are satisfied with the Official Narrative,
good on you ....
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 11:52
by inhuien
I don't need to ask ya any questions as I formed my own opinion regarding the 3 controlled demolitions years ago.
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 15:43
by Omphalos
SandRider wrote:oh .... okay .... I get in now ....
my late-nite drunken ramblings are amusing & perfectly acceptable,
as long as I'm attacking some irrelevant low-level SciFi hack over some
irrelevant comic books, or posting long, unread diatribes in the Amazon
Basement &etc
but, step out-of-line & point out the glaring holes in the 9/11 Commission Report,
and suddenly I'm the shitheel ....
it's been over 11 years, none this is "new" information, these are not
"new" radical ideas ... if you are not familiar with the points raised by the
"9/11 Truth Movement", if you have no questions in your mind whatsoever
about those events, nothing I could possibly post on this backwater forum
will change that .... not that I would wish to .... I merely offered to answer any
questions ... if y'all have none, if you are satisfied with the Official Narrative,
good on you ....
S'not that SR. At least for me, because whatever the truth is, nobody is ever going to figure it out.
Now, do I think the government lies to us all? Fuck yes. Every goddam day.
Do I think that some nefarious, unknown extra-governmental cabal set bin Laden up as a patsy after they set off a bomb at the Pentagon and erroneously blamed it on a jet liner just so they could scare the living shit out of Ma-and-Pa-2.3-kids and thereby guarantee the continued financial success of the governmental-war-machine?
Come the fuck on.
The real question is what they really are lying about, and my own highly tuned truth detector has told me that not one of the wackos who ramble on and on about this 9/11 conspiracy bullshit has even come close, the first six minutes of that innuendo laden yet fact-free video included.
And if you wanna make this personal, well fuck you. The fact is nobody here rides you when you lay into KJA is because we all agree with you on that. On this, not so much, so don't act all butt-hurt when the post you made to start comments actually generates a few.
Other than that, spout off all you want. I don't give a shit, and neither I nor anybody else who has posted here is trying to shut you up. We're only disagreeing. Fact is, I view your opinion as worthy, even if I think it's wrong. Know that . . . No. Remember that about this board and T(A)U and you will always know you are surrounded by friends who have already accepted you and love you and you will be happy. Or forget it and you'll wind up skulking off like a bitch. Whatever.
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 18:09
by Jabecca
Omphalos wrote:
...I think...Fuck yes. Every goddam day...Come the fuck on. ...my own highly tuned...detector....come... the first six minutes of that innuendo...And if you wanna make this personal...fuck...rides you...you lay...butt-hurt... spout off all you want. I don't give a shit...Fact is... your...worthy, even if I think it's wrong. Know that . . . No. Remember that... you will always know you are... accepted...and love you...you will be happy...
Oh, Omphy! My alien underlord!
My tail and jowls are a quivering!
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 20:03
by Eyes High
SR, no one is calling you a shitheel. I know you as a very intelligent man. I also wouldn't put it past you to start a conversation like this to see what would come about.
I think the vast majority on here are smart enough to know that our government has lied to us, does lie to us, and will continue to lie to us as long as they think they can get away with it.
I just personally believe that some of the conspiracies out there at too far fetched. Were we told the WHOLE truth about 911 -- no. But I don't believe the government was as involved to the extent as some people believe. A faction of the government -- POSSIBLE. But I believe it was more radical individuals than anything else. Now if those individuals were actually Muslims I do not know. What I do know is that the knee-jerk reactions some had against Muslims afterwards were downright IDIOTIC!
I believe I am not out of line in saying that most of us value your insights into many different topics, not just your opinions on you-know-who. Heck! I for one don't care to anything about him for a while.
Now grab a strong cup of coffee and get back to poster you old codger!
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 21:07
by SandRider
Eyes High wrote:SR I also wouldn't put it past you to start a conversation like this to see what would come about.
Eyes High wrote:SR I also wouldn't put it past you to start a conversation like this to see what would come about.
banned for accusing me of trollin'
wrong thread for that Papa Bear.
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 22:31
by distrans
has dr. Alan sabrosky, ex-director of studies at the u.s. army war college been mentioned yet?
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 23:26
by SadisticCynic
Eyes High wrote:
SandRider wrote:
Eyes High wrote:SR I also wouldn't put it past you to start a conversation like this to see what would come about.
banned for accusing me of trollin'
wrong thread for that Papa Bear.
(To be fair, I was havin' similar thoughts to you today Eyes. )
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 23:52
by SandRider
distrans wrote:has dr. Alan sabrosky, ex-director of studies at the u.s. army war college been mentioned yet?
have you not read the thread?
1) No. However, the Mossad-connection is the *most likely*, in regards to
the operatives who were in WTC1&2 for the ten days the "white vans" (not the
janitors' vans) in August 2001 were monitored & cataloged by FBI & CIA Agents)
your comment also insinuates *all* the "Mossad-connections",
I.E. the "dancing israelis ", the men arrested @the George Washington Bridge w/
a "truck-full" of explosives, the NYPD BOLO for "white cargo vans w/ graphics of planes & buildings ", their subsequent interviews on cable TeeVee, &etc.
to which I can only respond to by saying:
1) fits the MO of *many* CIA-Mossad operations ...
a) USS Liberty, or course, still more dark, Khobar Towers & The Anthrax ....
b) &etc.
2) the Israeli Military Intelligence's *only* role in the "Events of 9/11" was their
total promotion, abetting, planning & "global contingency co-ordination", & intel
assistance to the CIA, who later claimed these "sources" were "dubious" ...
2)b.) with the *possible* (tho, in my opinion, improbable) exception that Mossad Agents
somehow (by remote fly-by-wire)(mind-control of the actual hijackers)(&etc.) *were*
the Actual Agents responsible for the aircraft striking WTC 1&2 ....
{edit B4 submit}
{/edit B4 submit}
[edit 4 Poor-dude-bushwhacked on the street:]
not *Israel*, bro ... the MFen Mossad ...
[/edit]
^^ BTW, I believe that this video mostly EXONERATES the israeli citizens
(all employed by Urban Moving, but WTF? huh ...?) that were arrested by
NYPD on 9/11/01 .... yes, they *were* Mossad "operatives" (more likely
termed "assets", but again, WTF?) ... yes, they had "pre-knowledge"
of "9/11" (so did EVERY CIA asshat)(& FBI,cause, CIA had been SCREAMING
about it for months ...) ... I personally believe that that the Mossad would
*love* you to believe that they were the "Prime Players", but, in fact,
they were mere spectators ... (& mute cheerleaders) .... (Xcept for the Video
of the "dancing israelis" )
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 00:02
by Eyes High
SadisticCynic wrote:
Eyes High wrote:
SandRider wrote:
Eyes High wrote:SR I also wouldn't put it past you to start a conversation like this to see what would come about.
banned for accusing me of trollin'
wrong thread for that Papa Bear.
(To be fair, I was havin' similar thoughts to you today Eyes. )
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 01:36
by SandRider
Eyes High wrote:
SadisticCynic wrote:
Eyes High wrote:
SandRider wrote:
Eyes High wrote:SR I also wouldn't put it past you to start a conversation like this to see what would come about.
banned for accusing me of trollin'
wrong thread for that Papa Bear.
(To be fair, I was havin' similar thoughts to you today Eyes. )
hold up, hold the fuck up ...
are you attempting to implicate eyes high
in some type of
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 01:40
by SandRider
SandRider wrote:
Eyes High wrote:
SadisticCynic wrote:
Eyes High wrote:
SandRider wrote:
Eyes High wrote:SR I also wouldn't put it past you to start a conversation like this to see what would come about.
banned for accusing me of trollin'
wrong thread for that Papa Bear.
(To be fair, I was havin' similar thoughts to you today Eyes. )
hold up, hold the fuck up ...
are you attempting to implicate eyes high
in some type of
conspiracy ?? you better able to bak that up w/some
YouVideos , or somthing ...
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 01:52
by SandRider
SandRider wrote:
distrans wrote:has dr. Alan sabrosky, ex-director of studies at the u.s. army war college been mentioned yet?
have you not read the thread?
1) No. However, the Mossad-connection is the *most likely*, in regards to
the operatives who were in WTC1&2 for the ten days the "white vans" (not the
janitors' vans) in August 2001 were monitored & cataloged by FBI & CIA Agents)
your comment also insinuates *all* the "Mossad-connections",
I.E. the "dancing israelis ", the men arrested @the George Washington Bridge w/
a "truck-full" of explosives, the NYPD BOLO for "white cargo vans w/ graphics of planes & buildings ", their subsequent interviews on cable TeeVee, &etc.
to which I can only respond to by saying:
1) fits the MO of *many* CIA-Mossad operations ...
a) USS Liberty, or course, still more dark, Khobar Towers & The Anthrax ....
b) &etc.
2) the Israeli Military Intelligence's *only* role in the "Events of 9/11" was their
total promotion, abetting, planning & "global contingency co-ordination", & intel
assistance to the CIA, who later claimed these "sources" were "dubious" ...
2)b.) with the *possible* (tho, in my opinion, improbable) exception that Mossad Agents
somehow (by remote fly-by-wire)(mind-control of the actual hijackers)(&etc.) *were*
the Actual Agents responsible for the aircraft striking WTC 1&2 ....
{edit B4 submit}
{/edit B4 submit}
[edit 4 Poor-dude-bushwhacked on the street:]
not *Israel*, bro ... the MFen Mossad ...
[/edit]
^^ BTW, I believe that this video mostly EXONERATES the israeli citizens
(all employed by Urban Moving, but WTF? huh ...?) that were arrested by
NYPD on 9/11/01 .... yes, they *were* Mossad "operatives" (more likely
termed "assets", but again, WTF?) ... yes, they had "pre-knowledge"
of "9/11" (so did EVERY CIA asshat)(& FBI,cause, CIA had been SCREAMING
about it for months ...) ... I personally believe that that the Mossad would
*love* you to believe that they were the "Prime Players", but, in fact,
they were mere spectators ... (& mute cheerleaders) .... (Xcept for the Video
of the "dancing israelis" )
Re: 9/11 Answers
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 06:26
by lotek
SandRider wrote:
SandRider wrote:
Eyes High wrote:
SadisticCynic wrote:
Eyes High wrote:
SandRider wrote:
Eyes High wrote:SR I also wouldn't put it past you to start a conversation like this to see what would come about.
banned for accusing me of trollin'
wrong thread for that Papa Bear.
(To be fair, I was havin' similar thoughts to you today Eyes. )
hold up, hold the fuck up ...
are you attempting to implicate eyes high
in some type of
conspiracy ?? you better able to bak that up w/some
YouVideos , or somthing ...
)
