Jᴀᴄᴜʀᴜᴛᴜ - Tʜᴇ Cᴀsᴛ Oᴜᴛ

I've been studying all this for quite awhile now,
and feel confident I can convincingly answer any
possible question (with sources &etc.) about the
"events of 11 September 2001" ....


so, fire away ....

how do the top floors of buildings falling down
manage to fire steel girders hundreds of yards horizontally
before theyd fallen downward far enough to say oops?

why were civilian and military air traffic control besieged with fake signatures throughout the incident?

1) controlled demolition (thermite charges)

2) Vigilant Guardian

i think the guys who flew the planes in
were watching on tv...

jumping up and down
high fives

then the first tower blew up

and the guys who flew the planes in
stopped jumping up and down...

turned to each other and said

"who the fuck did that?!?!?!"


time wise

the owner of the center
and his interests
are still waiting for their cue to make an extra splash

okay, is there a conspiracy to cover-up the conspiracy to cover-up a conspiracy?

"Their simple minds came up with a simple trick and it worked."

Who did it, and why?

SandRider wrote:1) controlled demolition (thermite charges)

Say it ain't so, SR. A 9/11 Truther? You're way smarter than that.

HBJ

Eyes High wrote:okay, is there a conspiracy to cover-up the conspiracy to cover-up a conspiracy?

Yes.

inhuien wrote:Who did it, and why?

1) An extremely small cadre of Federal Military Brass, often referred to
as "The Trust", who took effective control of the US Federal Government on
the afternoon of 12 April 1945 ...

2) perpetual warfare

Hunchback Jack wrote: Say it ain't so, SR. A 9/11 Truther? You're way smarter than that.

"The only Truth about 9/11 is that we do not know the Truth about 9/11."
"The only conspiracy theory is the one Your Government sold you."

Argument:
The US Federal Government, in whatever capacity, could not have "pulled off"
9/11 as a "false flag" operation; a "conspiracy" of the required magnitude could
not possibly have been kept a "secret" ....

Rebuttal:
The Manhattan Project




Argument:
The US Federal Government, in whatever capacity, would never sacrifice
innocent civilians or fabricate an elaborate "cover-story" to further any
type of agenda, political or military ....

Rebuttal:
Sinking of the Lusitania
Pearl Harbor
Gulf of Tonkin Incident



Argument:
A small group cannot and would not attempt to "take control"
of the US Federal Government ...

Rebuttal:
General Smedley Butler

SandRider wrote:General Smedley Butler

"Old Gimlet Eye"

There sure is precedent as you say.

Rebuttal:
Sinking of the Lusitania
Pearl Harbor
Gulf of Tonkin Incident

My favourite inconsistency though was the BBC reporting the collapse of building 7 4or5 minutes before it went down. You missed JFK from your list.

So SandRider Oklahoma Lone lunatic or black ops, and there were pigeons down at the dock, they were heard to be saying coo, coo!

the remains of the murra federal building were buried and the site has been fenced and under armed guard ever since

the company who demolished it was later hired to demolish the wtc and its assets were in new york the weeks before 911

just as with the wtc, the visible damage mocks the official story.

Benton K. Partin Brigadier Gen. USAF covers this very professionally

At the initial kick off meeting when the masonic cabal first started to engineer the false flag attack on the world trade centre: why did they over-rule the guy who said, "Can't we just fly some actual planes into the towers?"

What's the connection betwee, 9/11 and Republican rage?

Does this have anything to do with teh 2nd Amendment?

How does Barak Obama's middle name figure into all fo this?

Wait a minute . . . Am I in the Politics! thread?????

Oh, whew.. No.

Omphalos wrote: What's the connection betwee, 9/11 and Republican rage?

911 interrupted reruns of i love lucky that most of them were watching with lunch
on account of their constipation waking them up at 3 in the morning

Omphalos wrote: Does this have anything to do with teh 2nd Amendment?

only if you think your pool clearner or gardner asking for you to pay your bill is a threat to your person

Omphalos wrote: How does Barak Obama's middle name figure into all fo this?

nicely

the JFK assassination doesn't really fit into my 9/11 Answers,
unless you believe the CIA killed him (the "rogue mis-guided Cuban faction")
partly or entirely because of his rejection of Operation Northwoods ....


also, forgot to add Operation Northwoods to the list,
for folks who think the US Federal Government would
never contemplate killing their own citizens to further
an agenda ....

DuneFishUK wrote:At the initial kick off meeting when the masonic cabal first started to engineer the false flag attack on the world trade centre: why did they over-rule the guy who said, "Can't we just fly some actual planes into the towers?"

actual planes were flown into WTC 1&2;
they were not, however, commercial airliners,
and the damage from the impacts was not the
cause of the collapse of WTC 1&2 ...

I believe it is possible that an aircraft
of some type was crashed into the
Pentagon, however, since the Federal Government
refuses to put this aspect of the events to rest
by releasing a single photograph of anything
hitting the Pentagon, from any of the hundreds of
security cameras scattered all over the area, I personally
feel justified in claiming just about any goddamned thing
I want .... it would be extremely easy to debunk such
claims .... show me a photo of the plane ... or the wreckage ... &etc.

distrans wrote:

Omphalos wrote: What's the connection betwee, 9/11 and Republican rage?

911 interrupted reruns of i love lucky that most of them were watching with lunch
on account of their constipation waking them up at 3 in the morning

Omphalos wrote: Does this have anything to do with teh 2nd Amendment?

only if you think your pool clearner or gardner asking for you to pay your bill is a threat to your person

Omphalos wrote: How does Barak Obama's middle name figure into all fo this?

nicely

adequately answered ...

next ... ?

why would terrorist,
honestly fearful of counterdiction

have flown around the petagon to the opposite side,
making themselves a target for minutes more than necessary
before flying into it?

Sand Rider, I know an individual who was a fire fighter who was seriously injured at the Pentagon. He saw the wreckage of the plane that hit the building. He says that it was the plane as reported by the media. I've known this fellow for many years and I belive him at his word.

Rob

Rob, I'm sure he saw "wreckage" of something ...

take a look again at the live news feeds from the site,
mere minutes after the explosions, and tell me what
you see ....

watch only the first six minutes of this video :

http://xkcd.com/258/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

HBJ

Hunchback Jack wrote:http://xkcd.com/258/

HBJ

Ah, now we're getting somewhere!