DUNE DISCUSSION FORUM FOR ORTHODOX HERBERTARIANS
http://www.jacurutu.com/
Baraka Bryan wrote:their responses typically fall into one of these two buckets:
1. the changes we make were in the notes
2. you're a hater
whether these are legitimate or not (you know my view, I'll leave you to make up your own mind on it) these are the typical responses we hear.
the problem:
1. they haven't shown evidence of the notes existence, the stories they tell about the notes all contradict each other, and even if notes existed, notes aren't finished product... they're brainstorms, not fully contrived ideas.
2. this is their response when they're either proven wrong, or the criticisms lodged are against style rather than content. he'll also claim that we're a minority and most people love the books, but evidence online at least is that KJA is loathed by all die-hard fans of the universes he's written in. He has fanboys, but from what I've seen, they're the minority.
SandChigger wrote:More often than not of late, they don't bother to respond at all.
Or at least KJA doesn't. The only time we hear shit from Brian Herbert is when they drag him out of the mothballs for a book tour, put his batteries back in and turn him on. Sort of. (Here we are in the midst of the greatest revolution in communication technology in human history and the technophobe Luddite has "philosophical reservations"?! WTF?)
Kevin J. Anderson is a coward. He won't face us directly but instead tries to shut us up or have us banned wherever and whenever he can. And then because he's such a "professional", he slips in little digs in the writing.
Or adds stuff on the sly when they put out the paperback version to "correct" a problem. (One case that we know of for certain, in Sandworms.)
In the paperback, it's different:Teg's expression did not change. Lack of control was not one of the Bashar's weak points. "You seemed distracted, so I took advantage of it."
As he looked at the young man before him, sweat dripping down his brow, Duncan saw a strangely doubled image. As an old man, the original Bashar had raised and trained the Duncan ghola child; later, after Teg's death on Rakis, the mature Duncan Idaho ghola had raised the reborn boy. Was this to be an endless cycle? Duncan Idaho and Miles Teg as eternal companions, alternating as mentor and student, each filling the same role at separate times in their lives?
IIRC they claimed that it was text that got left out during the copy editing process, blah blah blah. Kinda odd that something addressing a specific complaint made about the hardcover should have been accidently left out of it, huh?Teg's expression did not change. Lack of control was not one of the Bashar's weak points. "You seemed distracted, so I took advantage of it."
Duncan narrowed his eyes. "Good, I prefer for you to use your skill like that. But couldn't you just accelerate yourself, disarm me in the blink of an eye? Not all of us have forgotten what you can do."
Teg seemed briefly alarmed. "What I could do. If you only knew how that drained the old Bashar, and I'm just a ghola of him. I don't know how much my body can handle." He looked away, as if in embarrassment. "I would rather not remind the Sisters of it. You and Sheeana saw me once, but I doubt any of the others aboard this ship know. If Garimi ... well, you know how terrified some of them get when any male shows unexpected abilities. It wouldn't be safe for me."
As he looked at the young man before him, sweat dripping down his brow, Duncan saw a strangely doubled image. As an old man, the original Bashar had raised and trained the Duncan ghola child; later, after Teg's death on Rakis, the mature Duncan Idaho ghola had raised the reborn boy. Was this to be an endless cycle? Duncan Idaho and Miles Teg as eternal companions, alternating as mentor and student, each filling the same role at separate times in their lives?
That's my favourite one.Ampoliros wrote:Don't forget:"Who would know better what Frank Herbert intended to do with Dune than his own son?"
... grapevine... 
Ampoliros wrote:Since this thread has been bumped, I'll mention the vineyards from Hellhole, in which I got a response through the
Basically KJA responded that I "obviously hadn't read the book".
Since I was directly quoting something that was true in one place and NOT true in another: All the plants have to be grown in heavily shielded and filtered hydroponics since the native life was inherintly hostile and parasitic, AND the storms basically shred/scorch everything in their path. People have to live in bunker style buildings or shielded buildings to protect from the storms.
However the "rolling hillside covered in vast grapevines" only gets covered in Alkaline dust which has to be carefully blasted off with giant water guns. Apparently it is immune to both the native life and the storms which "scorch" and "gouge" the ground.
If anyone can find it, please post a link.Robspierre wrote:Ampoliros wrote:Since this thread has been bumped, I'll mention the vineyards from Hellhole, in which I got a response through the
Basically KJA responded that I "obviously hadn't read the book".
Since I was directly quoting something that was true in one place and NOT true in another: All the plants have to be grown in heavily shielded and filtered hydroponics since the native life was inherintly hostile and parasitic, AND the storms basically shred/scorch everything in their path. People have to live in bunker style buildings or shielded buildings to protect from the storms.
However the "rolling hillside covered in vast grapevines" only gets covered in Alkaline dust which has to be carefully blasted off with giant water guns. Apparently it is immune to both the native life and the storms which "scorch" and "gouge" the ground.
That was a classic thread on Amazon. The idiots couldn't figure out why the specific grapes mentioned were incapable of surviving the conditions described. Ol' Jizzy himself got worked up over that one.
Rob
It should be here: LINK!D Pope wrote:If anyone can find it, please post a link.Robspierre wrote:Ampoliros wrote:Since this thread has been bumped, I'll mention the vineyards from Hellhole, in which I got a response through the
Basically KJA responded that I "obviously hadn't read the book".
Since I was directly quoting something that was true in one place and NOT true in another: All the plants have to be grown in heavily shielded and filtered hydroponics since the native life was inherintly hostile and parasitic, AND the storms basically shred/scorch everything in their path. People have to live in bunker style buildings or shielded buildings to protect from the storms.
However the "rolling hillside covered in vast grapevines" only gets covered in Alkaline dust which has to be carefully blasted off with giant water guns. Apparently it is immune to both the native life and the storms which "scorch" and "gouge" the ground.
That was a classic thread on Amazon. The idiots couldn't figure out why the specific grapes mentioned were incapable of surviving the conditions described. Ol' Jizzy himself got worked up over that one.
Rob
I can't find it anywhere.
Brian Herbert wrote:There was a group on the Internet before House Atreides was published -- that
was our first novel that came out in 1999 -- and there was a hue and cry before
that book was published asserting that we should not write a new novel in the
series. Later, after they read the first novel, many of them actually apologized to
us in writing. So we appreciate that. And I understand the fans that feel... I guess
"an interest" in the series. They don't have a legal interest in it, but they have a
stake in it of sorts, in that they love the stories, they love the universe, they love
what my dad set up. But I try to write for the most demanding of fans. Kevin does
too.
He forgot to add: ZING!D Pope wrote:Brian Herbert wrote:There was a group on the Internet before House Atreides was published -- that
was our first novel that came out in 1999 -- and there was a hue and cry before
that book was published asserting that we should not write a new novel in the
series. Later, after they read the first novel, many of them actually apologized to
us in writing. So we appreciate that. And I understand the fans that feel... I guess
"an interest" in the series. They don't have a legal interest in it, but they have a
stake in it of sorts, in that they love the stories, they love the universe, they love
what my dad set up. But I try to write for the most demanding of fans. Kevin does
too.
thekev does the most demanding of fans.D Pope wrote: But I try to write for the most demanding of fans. Kevin does
too.
Said in the same breath.Kevin J. Anderson: Well, I've dealt with a lot of rabid fans, especially with Star Wars and X-Files,
and it's really creepy to deal with people who know more about my stuff than I do sometimes.
I'm writing the books that [Brian and I] really know how to do.
...soooo, inconsistency more accurately indicates sincerity?kja wrote:Anyone who keeps reading the novels for the sole purpose of attacking them just has an axe to grind and is clearly biased.
<earlier>
And when somebody posts with great vehemence how much they hated book after book after book, how can you take them seriously?
kja wrote: I wish they would stop reading Dune books or at the very least suffer
from a head injury that would make them forget that Dune even existed.
“Again, thanks for giving the novels a chance, whether or not you liked all of them.
Regarding your issues with Face Dancers and the remnants of the Butlerian Jihad,
that was tied together in the books and detailed in Erasmus’s experiments to create
the Face Dancers. It’s not my call whether or not you found the explanation or the
resolution satisfying, but it’s not inconsistent with the series as a whole.”
How much of the prequel is based on Frank Herbert's notes?
A lot of the ideas were original, but some were taken from the existing material. We knew some of the major
points to go to but we didn't know the exact route to take.
It was like a treasure trove for us to find all those notes. We're drawing on scenes and notes and quotes that
have never been published. Especially now that we have the outline for the last Dune novel he intended to write,
he ties the last story together with the first one and ties up a lot of little loose threads.
Do you plan to work together on completing Dune 7?
We do have plans but they're not crystallized. We have plans and notes for probably 10 more books.
What exact order we write those in or whether we even write them at all--that will be decided on a book by book basis.
The Butlerian Jihad will probably be the next.
By doing this original prequel trilogy, we're hoping to reawaken interest in all of Frank Herbert's Dune novels.
There are so many things we need to set up in the Butlerian Jihad timeframe--things that tie directly into Dune 7.
In true Frank Herbert fashion, we are looking at a genuine long term plan. Because all of this is about a giant saga,
it's good for us to be thinking about all of this, so maybe we'll be planting seeds.
How do you think readers will respond to the new book?
The readers will have to decide. We're aware that some of them have to be skeptical as to how we can put on
such giant shoes, but between Brian and I we're sticking two feet into each one. I'm thrilled for the opportunity
to write a book in my favorite science fiction universe. I hope to be able to play in the sandbox for a while longer.