Page 4 of 4

Re: The Briancella Theory

Posted: 09 May 2010 10:07
by MrFlibble
SandChigger wrote:And it sounds like AFT has simply followed Chomsky's model in playing on the general public ignorance to parlay his reputation in one field into an aura of authority in another.
Yeah, the Great Noam sure has lots of followers who write books "popularizing" his theory - which turn out to be shameless attempts at convincing the public it's the only "true" theory. But apart from ridiculing the opponents as the main argumentative strategy, I think there's very little in common as ATF prolly hasn't even heard of Chomsky in the first place, and his linguistic "methods" do not bear the slightest semblance to any real linguistics, and wouldn't fool anyone with basic education in the field (unlike Chomsky, who appears to be more cunning in this respect).

Re: The Briancella Theory

Posted: 09 May 2010 10:33
by SandChigger
Yes, he's one cunning ... no, I can't write it! Bleh! :lol:

Eeew! I wonder if there are Chomsky groupie girls?! :shock:

His wife died in December two years back. I wonder if he's been dipping the ole wick in an MIT coed or two since? :?

Re: The Briancella Theory

Posted: 09 May 2010 10:39
by Freakzilla
Get a spoon handy to gouge out your eyes...

MIT Coeds

Re: The Briancella Theory

Posted: 09 May 2010 15:08
by merkin muffley
Freakzilla wrote:Get a spoon handy to gouge out your eyes...

MIT Coeds
don't cream your jeans!

Re: The Briancella Theory

Posted: 09 May 2010 15:43
by SandRider
shit, wait to you get to be my age .... all them little girls look good ...

but what's with the one dude off to the side ?

Re: The Briancella Theory

Posted: 09 May 2010 15:46
by Freakzilla
SandRider wrote:shit, wait to you get to be my age .... all them little girls look good ...

but what's with the one dude off to the side ?
Obviously their pet queen.

Re: The Briancella Theory

Posted: 09 May 2010 16:21
by Ampoliros
Chicks don't have to be perfect as long as they are functional!