Page 3 of 5

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 13:07
by GamePlayer
TheDukester wrote:1. The admins have made it clear that the personal attacks are getting to be a bit much;
As long as the sexual advances aren't a problem, I'm fine with that :)
redbugpest wrote:That is what I thought. There is no “Provable Fact” and Dukester isn’t man enough to post that he spoke out of turn on the Amazon forum.
I suppose the real question is, are you woman enough to share your phone number with me? Or better yet, will you admit how androgynous you actually are, sending send me into an orgiastic state at the thought of you being lightly slapped with veal? :teasing-tease:

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 13:35
by SandRider
sorry Chig, I just have to ...
redbugpest wrote: I have developed a healthy respect for the depth of knowledge you have on the originals, but feel that it is unfortunate that you have chosen to let you {sic} site be a haven for the intolerant such as The Dukester and Sandchigger.
what about me, you little asshat pickle-fucker ?!?

I've got plenty of hate-filled, intolerant things to say about Keith,
and I've never read more than a few pages of his bullshit, save what
I've been tricked into reading here and on the Chiggerblog.

I have a deep-seated loathing for the jackass as a person as well.

You just name them because they've thrown out flames at you.
OK, here's one for you : after looking at your white-trash, asinine
MySpace page (oh, & unlock your photo albums, hmmm ?) I've come
to the conclusion you are a disgrace to Southern Men and should be
lynched.

how's that for an unnecessary personal attack ?
tool.
Mr. Teg wrote:A negative review is never removed unless requested by the account holders on Amazon.

Guess who...
there's your answer, BTW.

& Teg, how do we prove that, to this shithead & the others ?
Is that buried in the Amazon fine print somewhere ?



& Freak, I'm sorry. Not really, but you know what I mean.
I'm actually considering, out of respect for you, clicking
cancel instead submit ....

aww, let's jess flip a coin ...

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 13:46
by TheDukester
My God, it's just non-stop entertainment over at Amazon. Anyone on a lunch break or just chillin' at home should check it out.

Pestie has lost it. I can't think of any other way to describe it.

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 13:50
by redbugpest
Nekhrun wrote:Amazon removes 1 star reviews. I genuinely hate kja's writing and have provided numerous criticisms for more than 10 years. They are honest and text based dislikes. Amazon will remove them but not the 5 star ones. I wonder why... :roll:

I give anyone credit for even trying to provide that prick with information to his questions, but the time has come to let him do some of that work on his own. It's all here and on Amazon open to the world, unlike kja's treehouse. (BTW, I like the excuse that it's a place they can go where they don't have to worry about us getting in as if any of kja's other sites allow us to comment [e.g. Facebook, MySpace, Dunenovels, Wordfire, Twitter, etc.] none of those allow for dissenting opinions either. Makes me wonder about what's going on at the special site).

Like some of you, I will not be responding to a hypocritical kja apologist who refuses to answer for the crimes against literature we've cited time and time again. The threads are here ready for discussion. I kind of like watching him bounce around from thread to thread trying to get someone to play with him, but now I'm thankful for the ignore feature.
Reviews being removed is not proof of the larger conspiricy.

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 13:53
by SandRider
oh, I get it --

he's playing the :snooty: game on me !!


CONFOUND YOU CONWAY !!!!

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 13:55
by Nekhrun
TheDukester wrote:My God, it's just non-stop entertainment over at Amazon. Anyone on a lunch break or just chillin' at home should check it out.

Pestie has lost it. I can't think of any other way to describe it.
He has. It's been kind of fun to watch him whine to Amazon and then realize that even though they might delete reviews, we probably spend a lot more money with them than he does so crying to mommy isn't going to work. Having a couple days off when this book came out has been great. I'm glad they moved up their normal release date!

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 13:56
by Nekhrun
SandRider wrote:oh, I get it --

he's playing the :snooty: game on me !!


CONFOUND YOU CONWAY !!!!
He's great at the :snooty: game on Amazon. He refuses to answer any of our questions but poses plenty of his own. He must hate that we have answers and years of kja in his own words to damn him.

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 14:16
by SandChigger
Um ... did the ball-less wonder really post something about Dukester not being man enough to blah blah blah? :shock:

TOO RICH!!! :laughing-rolling:

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 16:27
by Hunchback Jack
Just to reiterate something SR said, because it is *precisely* the issue that Conway raised, so he should be interested:
Sandrider wrote:
Mr. Teg wrote: A negative review is never removed unless requested by the account holders on Amazon.

Guess who...
there's your answer, BTW.

& Teg, how do we prove that, to this shithead & the others ?
Is that buried in the Amazon fine print somewhere ?
Do we know how to confirm that's true?

HBJ

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 16:41
by Freakzilla
redbugpest wrote:
Freakzilla wrote:Whether or not Keith is manipulating online book reviews still doesn't make his books not suck.

It doesn't matter whether we accept Red's explainations and interpretations for our issues, the FACT is, FH's books are canon and if Pinky & The Brian had adhered closely to Frank's story and even his general themes, we wouldn't have these issues.
You’re welcome to your opinion. None of the people that like the new Dune books have ever said that you have to like them.
Nor have we said you can't like KJA's "efforts".

It's when you call them "good Dune books" that we must protest. For they are not and we have given you several topics of reasons, citing inconsistancies and contradictions with canon. One of which you suggested an expaination which we dismissed as a physical impossibility.

This does not mean we're close minded, it means your answer (KJA/BHs) sucks. We told you why, too. That alone indicates that some of us took time to serioulsy consider what you were saying.
I have developed a healthy respect for the depth of knowledge you have on the originals, but feel that it is unfortunate that you have chosen to let you site be a haven for the intolerant such as The Dukester and Sandchigger.
First, thank you.

Second, I suport Sandchigger's cause. Duke, well, I just like to keep him around for when things get ugly. ;)

Seriously, I've known both for a while and respect them for their Dune knowledge and dedication.

All are welcome at Jacuturu... if you can stand the heat. :twisted:

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 16:44
by SandRider
yeah, cause I can also go with Duke's idea that amazon itself removes
low ratings to make EVERYTHING look good ...


and hey, Conway, check it out - we're having a discussion about
Truth & Honesty - theirs AND ours ...

don't that just shift yer paradigm ?

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 16:49
by Freakzilla
redbugpest wrote:
TheDukester wrote:
Freakzilla wrote:... FH's books are canon and if Pinky & The Brian had adhered closely to Frank's story and even his general themes, we wouldn't have these issues.
I can trump that one:

If the HLP had decided, 10 or 12 years ago, to continue the Dune series with an author or authors who knew the first thing about Dune, respected Frank Herbert's legacy, took time to craft and revise their work, and weren't out for nothing more than a few dollars, then this site would not even exist.

We'd all be over at DuneNovels.com, discussing how much we appreciate that the new books were being crafted with care.
I doubt that. I do not think that any author would be "good enough"

BTW the Greg Bear novel is lame so far.
Hey, I might have eventually started my own Dune forum anyway. It had been something I've always wanted to do.

Red, I never expected prose anywhere near FH's level, I just expected them to respect his work by staying consistant with the published canon and FH's themes. I don't think I've ever really talked bad about their non-dimensional characters, repetition and just plain bad writting, there is plenty of suck to go around.

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 17:00
by TheDukester
Freakzilla wrote: Duke, well, I just like to keep him around for when things get ugly. ;)
Wait ... what?

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 17:57
by Hunchback Jack
Freakzilla wrote:Red, I never expected prose anywhere near FH's level, I just expected them to respect his work by staying consistant with the published canon and FH's themes. I don't think I've ever really talked bad about their non-dimensional characters, repetition and just plain bad writting, there is plenty of suck to go around.
This is pretty much my take, too. I would have been skeptical about any author taking Dune on, but if they did three things:

* showed a keen interest in getting the details right, and expanding on the themes of the universe
* could actually write a book where the plot held together and the characters were real enough that I cared about them
* showed respect and humility when speaking in interviews and with fans about continuing the legacy

... then even if I didn't like the books themselves, I wouldn't think they were "destroying the Dune legacy".

HBJ

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 18:27
by Mandy
Dune fans aren't the only people who complain about Amazon deleting one star reviews. This has been going on for years. Here are a few examples:

http://www.planetfeedback.com/amazoncom ... ews/307295" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/bailey-reviews.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://motls.blogspot.com/2005/08/amazo ... kpots.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://askville.amazon.com/Amazon-routi ... d=12828922" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.bucksright.com/amazon-deleti ... -masse-304" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazo ... s-like-it/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 18:40
by TheDukester
And THAT is some good research. Nicely done.

(Should I point out the obvious here? Nah ... let's see if he even notices)

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 19:06
by Tleszer
Oh, he'll notice. He'll just choose to ignore it and call our opinions closed-minded without backing up any of his claims.

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 19:43
by Mr. Teg
I work in publishing and manage several accounts on Amazon for the US, Japan, France and Germany.

Amazon never removes reviews unless requested by the account holder and qualifies for removal under set guidelines.

I can see how Amazon may have been convinced by TOR & HLP that 1 star reviews for their books are a unique and don't represent legitimate reviews, so the request for deletions are automatically granted. I'm not saying that is right, but that is most likely what is happening.

Regardless, at the end of the day, TOR/HLP have to request the deletions.
All you can do is directly contact and complain to Amazon when this happens which is hit and miss depending if you get the guy in Mumbai.

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 21:23
by Robspierre
They have tried repeatedly to remove my 1 star reviews and it it takes about three days of bullshit to get them back up, keep hitting them with "It was within the guidelines" and they eventually do repost them, in some cases.

Rob

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 22:22
by Eyes High
TheDukester wrote:
Freakzilla wrote: Duke, well, I just like to keep him around for when things get ugly. ;)
Wait ... what?
Maybe he's saying you're the fall to guy.

So since you have our backs, I believe we can have yours. :twisted: No one messes with our Duke.

Oh and I think I have seen, over the past few days, the shining example of the KJA's special forces I've heard so much about. :ugeek:

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 22:29
by Mr. Teg
Looking for the FACTS...

A pic of Red during a special little trooper meeting with the Jacket.

Image

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 22:58
by SandChigger
Eeew. Just like one of them there little ankle-biting yippy yappy dogs? Bleh!

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 23:45
by Rakis
Mr. Teg wrote:Looking for the FACTS...

A pic of Red during a special little trooper meeting with the Jacket.

Image
:lol: :clap:

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 23:45
by redbugpest
Freakzilla wrote:
redbugpest wrote:
Freakzilla wrote:Whether or not Keith is manipulating online book reviews still doesn't make his books not suck.

It doesn't matter whether we accept Red's explainations and interpretations for our issues, the FACT is, FH's books are canon and if Pinky & The Brian had adhered closely to Frank's story and even his general themes, we wouldn't have these issues.
You’re welcome to your opinion. None of the people that like the new Dune books have ever said that you have to like them.
Nor have we said you can't like KJA's "efforts".

It's when you call them "good Dune books" that we must protest. For they are not and we have given you several topics of reasons, citing inconsistancies and contradictions with canon. One of which you suggested an expaination which we dismissed as a physical impossibility.

This does not mean we're close minded, it means your answer (KJA/BHs) sucks. We told you why, too. That alone indicates that some of us took time to serioulsy consider what you were saying.
I have developed a healthy respect for the depth of knowledge you have on the originals, but feel that it is unfortunate that you have chosen to let you site be a haven for the intolerant such as The Dukester and Sandchigger.
First, thank you.

Second, I suport Sandchigger's cause. Duke, well, I just like to keep him around for when things get ugly. ;)

Seriously, I've known both for a while and respect them for their Dune knowledge and dedication.

All are welcome at Jacuturu... if you can stand the heat. :twisted:
I have consistently said that they are not anything like FH’s Dune, and feel that they are good in their own standing as SF books. As for the items that you list as inconsistencies and contradictions with canon, all I can say is this:

Not every Item is integral to the overall plot, so something like the data packet issue, to me, is not worth bothering about, because it is obvious that the author intended that the signal be received at a later time through some device. It was clear early on that Omnius would be the intended final antagonist.

Some inconsistencies are going to appear in just about any book of any genre, I have enough imagination to see something that may have been an editing miss and just fill it in with what I felt the author intended and move on (like the disappearing / reappearing arm).

KJA / BH really do not have the same vision as FH had, and that will inevitably lead to items that do not “feel” right, or may take a stretch of the imagination. That would be the same with any author who would choose to write in the Dune Universe, just as I am seeing with Greg Bear in Foundation. He is not being as true to Asmov’s universe as I would like so far.

Other items that you have an issue with may just be the way that you choose to interpreted it, such as OM (I believe I may have actually surprised Chiggie with a quote I found in Chapterhouse to support my claim). This is where we will benefit most in discourse, as I also have an open mind, and am willing to adjust my cognitive schemata in the face of new information.

Just do not expect me to believe everything just because you say it is so. I will look it up for myself, and will challenge your interpretations if I feel that they are not in keeping with what perceive the authors message to be.

I cannot condone SC and some others activities, because they strike me as being in line with the type of extremist ideology that plagues the world today. The “if you do not agree with me I am going to call you names” thing really just removes credibility. I do not have much tolerance for that kind of stupid shit.

SC in particular is responsible for any effort by KJA’s fans to be more active. Fanaticism breeds fanaticism. You cannot cry foul because you have polarized the field through you actions.

The claim that Amazon may be removing reviews for sales and marketing reasons is probably correct, but not a KJA / TOR / HPL conspiracy. I would forward the theory that it is an industry wide issue because all publishers have a stake in the sales figures. It’s business.

Last thing before I call it a night.

I can stand the heat, and will continue to come back here, if you want to have a true dialog on some of these issues. Don’t ask or expect me to explain every little inconsistency as:
1. I didn’t write the books
2. I don’t have all the answers
3. I do not EVER pass notes or play as a go between with KJA or HLP
4. I do not have a ton of excess time.

I work, I go to school full time, I have a family. All of that comes before this and my other interests.

RBP

Re: Looking for the FACTS...

Posted: 07 Aug 2009 23:48
by redbugpest
Mr. Teg wrote:I work in publishing and manage several accounts on Amazon for the US, Japan, France and Germany.

Amazon never removes reviews unless requested by the account holder and qualifies for removal under set guidelines.

I can see how Amazon may have been convinced by TOR & HLP that 1 star reviews for their books are a unique and don't represent legitimate reviews, so the request for deletions are automatically granted. I'm not saying that is right, but that is most likely what is happening.

Regardless, at the end of the day, TOR/HLP have to request the deletions.
All you can do is directly contact and complain to Amazon when this happens which is hit and miss depending if you get the guy in Mumbai.
I did notice that the CS dept was Indian. Big mistake for a book seller IMHO.

I would bet it is more TOR than anything, as they are the biggest stakeholder in the books. But I have no proof.