The Jihad (and Alia), round... whatever.
Posted: 24 Jun 2009 05:31
Just a new thread to summarize and remind everyone that it is now 4 months ago KJA got the opportunity to respond to this.
(This is the debate that was cut short by me being banned from DN - Arnoldo and others had their turn and rejected it).
With the new influx of pro-prequel-blood (hi
) , I thought it would be fun to give it whirl (I know, I am odd that way, we've been through that).
/Lundse
-
Message for KJA @ http://www.youtube.com/user/writerKJA:
Hi. I was wondering if you could clear up the following problem, explained in the next two posts. It seems to be an inherent contradiction in the purported canon incompassing both the Frank Herbert originals and the new books...
The contradiction is of course expressed in claim 10. Am I misreading something here, which statement is wrong according to the combined canon, or does not follow from the claims I believe it does?
Thanks in advance!
1 - Alia has memories from the time of the Jihad, about Omnius et al. (originals).
2 - A. wishes for a machine to give her mentat level advice (Dune Messiah).
3 - A. characterises such a machine as 'compliant' and trustworthy (DM).
4 - A machine with mentat-like capabilities is a powerful artificial intelligence (definition).
5 - Omnius was a powerful artificial intelligence (prequels).
6 - O. tried to enslave and kill mankind (prequels).
7 - O. was an AI which was not compliant or trustworthy (5 and 6).
8 - Alia knows that a powerful AI can be untrustworthy and non-'compliant' the degree of enabling genocide (1 and 7).
9 - A. believes a powerful AI would be trustworthy and 'compliant' (3 and 4).
10 - A. both believes, and does not believe, that a powerful artificial intelligence is 'compliant' and trustworthy (8 and 9).
(This is the debate that was cut short by me being banned from DN - Arnoldo and others had their turn and rejected it).
With the new influx of pro-prequel-blood (hi

/Lundse
-
Message for KJA @ http://www.youtube.com/user/writerKJA:
Hi. I was wondering if you could clear up the following problem, explained in the next two posts. It seems to be an inherent contradiction in the purported canon incompassing both the Frank Herbert originals and the new books...
The contradiction is of course expressed in claim 10. Am I misreading something here, which statement is wrong according to the combined canon, or does not follow from the claims I believe it does?
Thanks in advance!
1 - Alia has memories from the time of the Jihad, about Omnius et al. (originals).
2 - A. wishes for a machine to give her mentat level advice (Dune Messiah).
3 - A. characterises such a machine as 'compliant' and trustworthy (DM).
4 - A machine with mentat-like capabilities is a powerful artificial intelligence (definition).
5 - Omnius was a powerful artificial intelligence (prequels).
6 - O. tried to enslave and kill mankind (prequels).
7 - O. was an AI which was not compliant or trustworthy (5 and 6).
8 - Alia knows that a powerful AI can be untrustworthy and non-'compliant' the degree of enabling genocide (1 and 7).
9 - A. believes a powerful AI would be trustworthy and 'compliant' (3 and 4).
10 - A. both believes, and does not believe, that a powerful artificial intelligence is 'compliant' and trustworthy (8 and 9).