Jᴀᴄᴜʀᴜᴛᴜ - Tʜᴇ Cᴀsᴛ Oᴜᴛ

That's the only reason I watched the first one.

There's plenty of beautiful women out there and I don't have to watch some lousy movie to see them. Well okay, there are chick flicks one must endure, but that's different

GamePlayer wrote:There's plenty of beautiful women out there and I don't have to watch some lousy movie to see them. Well okay, there are chick flicks one must endure, but that's different

OK, OK... my kids wanted to see it too.

yeah exactly, fun for the kids and their fathers

Freakzilla wrote:

GamePlayer wrote:There's plenty of beautiful women out there and I don't have to watch some lousy movie to see them. Well okay, there are chick flicks one must endure, but that's different

OK, OK... my kids wanted to see it too.

You get a free pass. I made my parents endure plenty of lousy movies too

GamePlayer wrote:

Freakzilla wrote:

GamePlayer wrote:There's plenty of beautiful women out there and I don't have to watch some lousy movie to see them. Well okay, there are chick flicks one must endure, but that's different

OK, OK... my kids wanted to see it too.

You get a free pass. I made my parents endure plenty of lousy movies too

I using that same line then, so il take that free pass also.

Baraka Bryan wrote:damnit Rakis! you crazy frogs are making the rest of us canadians look bad

You mean Rakis only represents some Canadians?

Why can't we just make a film with beautiful Hollywood actresses dancing around half-naked (or more), with guns and explosions and awesome cgi in the background. Why bother with plot? That's the part they always screw up.

I would see that. Plot is only for women and cattle, anyways.

Rakis wrote:

Baraka Bryan wrote:

Rakis wrote:

Baraka Bryan wrote:
I'm still looking forward to all of those though

Yep, with a big jar of pop corn and a giant Coke...

nah... i'm too cheap to buy theatre food

No worries...it's on the old man --->

well, alright then, I'll take all you little bastards to the moving picture show,
but I ain't buying you no fucking popcorn or caramel apples or none of that
shit.

In my day, we didn't even have moving pictures, we'd just take a
Superman comic book and shake it real fast. (Back then, nickels had pictures of
bumble-bees on them. "Gimme five bees for a quarter", we'd say. 'Course that
was before The War, when they started rationing pickels and the Kaiser stole
the letter "N" ..... )

LO f'n L

Chigger did you also have to walk 5 miles to school starting at grade 1?

Hell, bowa, they weren't no damd school wittin fahv malls a us, sose in tha awf munts whin Pah dinn need me ta heulp awt in tha feels, ah borded wit tha reltivs oar in Ashfalls an wint ta school frum there wit mah cuzins.


(Damn ... calm me Bascule, huh? )

SandChigger wrote:The Klingon subtitles bit....



Ahem.

I have to admit, though, I laugh out loud every time the trailer plays on TV and I see them assembling a starship on a planet's surface.

But come on, it's STAR TREK, fer chrissakes! It's not like we're talking about science fiction.

Remember that the Voyager lands on planets.

Yes she is, pretty!

SwordMaster wrote:I am hype for transformers, mostly because of megan fox.

"Dune: Reloaded" (produced by Kevin J. Anderson)
Those half nekkid chicks might be Jessica, Irulan, Gaius Mohiam, Chani, adult Alia and Gurney Halleck (the character would be reinvented and become a female, like Starbuck in Battlestar Galactica, an idea taken from TAU)

Ampoliros wrote:Why can't we just make a film with beautiful Hollywood actresses dancing around half-naked (or more), with guns and explosions and awesome cgi in the background. Why bother with plot? That's the part they always screw up.

cmsahe wrote:Remember that the Voyager lands on planets.

I do, actually. But I think the Voyager is smaller than a starship like Enterprise?

Loved the vid

SandRider wrote:

Rakis wrote:

Baraka Bryan wrote:

Rakis wrote:

Baraka Bryan wrote:
I'm still looking forward to all of those though

Yep, with a big jar of pop corn and a giant Coke...

nah... i'm too cheap to buy theatre food

No worries...it's on the old man --->

well, alright then, I'll take all you little bastards to the moving picture show,
but I ain't buying you no fucking popcorn or caramel apples or none of that
shit.

In my day, we didn't even have moving pictures, we'd just take a
Superman comic book and shake it real fast. (Back then, nickels had pictures of
bumble-bees on them. "Gimme five bees for a quarter", we'd say. 'Course that
was before The War, when they started rationing pickels and the Kaiser stole
the letter "N" ..... )

Can you be God? Pretty please!

Tleszer wrote:

Baraka Bryan wrote:damnit Rakis! you crazy frogs are making the rest of us canadians look bad

You mean Rakis only represents some Canadians?

Only french separatists from the north...

SandChigger wrote:

cmsahe wrote:Remember that the Voyager lands on planets.

I do, actually. But I think the Voyager is smaller than a starship like Enterprise?

Indeed and it was still built in space...

Rakis wrote:

SandChigger wrote:

cmsahe wrote:Remember that the Voyager lands on planets.

I do, actually. But I think the Voyager is smaller than a starship like Enterprise?

Indeed and it was still built in space...

This all reminds me of the idiocy of Heighliners being build INSIDE IX, underground. How many Constitution Class starships could you put in a Heighliner?

Freakzilla wrote:

Rakis wrote:

SandChigger wrote:

cmsahe wrote:Remember that the Voyager lands on planets.

I do, actually. But I think the Voyager is smaller than a starship like Enterprise?

Indeed and it was still built in space...

This all reminds me of the idiocy of Heighliners being build INSIDE IX, underground. How many Constitution Class starships could you put in a Heighliner?

Depends on the size of the Heighliner...why?

Rakis wrote:

Freakzilla wrote:

Rakis wrote:

SandChigger wrote:

cmsahe wrote:Remember that the Voyager lands on planets.

I do, actually. But I think the Voyager is smaller than a starship like Enterprise?

Indeed and it was still built in space...

This all reminds me of the idiocy of Heighliners being build INSIDE IX, underground. How many Constitution Class starships could you put in a Heighliner?

Depends on the size of the Heighliner...why?

It wasn't a serious question, there's no size given for heighliners besides "really big". Just rekindling my hatred for September...

Freakzilla wrote:

Rakis wrote:

Freakzilla wrote:

Rakis wrote:

SandChigger wrote:

cmsahe wrote:Remember that the Voyager lands on planets.

I do, actually. But I think the Voyager is smaller than a starship like Enterprise?

Indeed and it was still built in space...

This all reminds me of the idiocy of Heighliners being build INSIDE IX, underground. How many Constitution Class starships could you put in a Heighliner?

Depends on the size of the Heighliner...why?

It wasn't a serious question, there's no size given for heighliners besides "really big". Just rekindling my hatred for September...

I think it's time for that volcano of beer thing...

T minus 7 hours...

In my day, we didn't even have moving pictures, we'd just take a
Superman comic book and shake it real fast.

That was brilliant, really did have me laughing out loud!