Page 4 of 4

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 12 Jun 2010 21:21
by Nekhrun
I'd say Freakban him, but that'd be too good a term for him. Maybe he's off to read the books for once and he'll come back and apologize.

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 12 Jun 2010 21:51
by SandChigger
Nah. He's far less objectionable than some of the other "characters" around here who no one ever suggests freakbanning. ;)

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 12 Jun 2010 21:54
by Freakzilla
It takes a lot more than being a religious nut to get banned around here.

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 12 Jun 2010 21:58
by SandChigger
Exactly! Take Thang for instance...

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 12 Jun 2010 22:28
by A Thing of Eternity
SandChigger wrote:Exactly! Take Thang for instance...
HEY!

Mpork was OK, just confused and looking for something that wasn't there. If I had his missguided beliefs I'd get angry at us too. But I don't. Which is nice.

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 12 Jun 2010 22:56
by TheDukester
His beliefs never entered the equation for me; he can worship half-cooked carrots for all I care.

But people who don't get the answer they want, then keep pounding away over and over and over again are both funny and annoying.

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 12 Jun 2010 23:14
by merkin muffley
SandChigger wrote:Nah. He's far less objectionable than some of the other "characters" around here who no one ever suggests freakbanning. ;)
I'm still here. :P

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 12 Jun 2010 23:55
by SandChigger
A Thing of Eternity wrote:
SandChigger wrote:Exactly! Take Thang for instance...
HEY!
Oh, Thang! Dude, SORRY! Obviously I was thinking merkin and somehow typed "Thang"! :oops:





:lol:



(I miss mrpork. :cry: )

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 00:04
by SandRider
merkin muffley wrote:
SandChigger wrote:Nah. He's far less objectionable than some of the other "characters" around here who no one ever suggests freakbanning. ;)
I'm still here. :P

I think there's a Naib Conclave on this issue next weekend ...

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 03:18
by merkin muffley
SandRider wrote:I think there's a Naib Conclave on this issue next weekend ...
uh oh :shock:

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 03:41
by SandChigger
Meh, don't sweat it. Usually we just end up getting drunk and sitting around telling Leto/Moneo fart jokes. :P

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 03:45
by A Thing of Eternity
TheDukester wrote:; he can worship half-cooked carrots for all I care.
:lol: Man, I promise one day I will use that in a theist vs atheist argument!
SandChigger wrote:
A Thing of Eternity wrote:
SandChigger wrote:Exactly! Take Thang for instance...
HEY!
Oh, Thang! Dude, SORRY! Obviously I was thinking merkin and somehow typed "Thang"! :oops:
My black panther buddies are going to get you! :cat fight:

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 04:02
by SandChigger
HAWT! :P

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 04:19
by merkin muffley
SandChigger wrote:Meh, don't sweat it. Usually we just end up getting drunk and sitting around telling Leto/Moneo fart jokes. :P
How do you know where Leto's ass is? Put him in a bowl of flour and wait 'til he farts.


If the conclave rules against me, can I come back as Frank Walden?

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 07:33
by Nekhrun
SandChigger wrote:Nah. He's far less objectionable than some of the other "characters" around here who no one ever suggests freakbanning. ;)
It's not that I think he was objectionable, but if someone claims that they are leaving then changing their password would ensure that no unsavory types hack into their accounts while they're away. We wouldn't want that would we? After all, he said he wasn't coming back. :twisted:

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 09:17
by SandChigger
Can't argue with THAT logic! :lol:

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 10:48
by Freakzilla
I've had people as me to delete their accounts. Why bother? If you don't want to be here just stay away.

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 13:50
by lotek
SandChigger wrote:Meh, don't sweat it.
that's a waste of moisture
As for Moneo jokes; how about that?

Image

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 15:50
by Eyes High
lotek wrote:
SandChigger wrote:Meh, don't sweat it.
that's a waste of moisture
As for Moneo jokes; how about that?

Image
Img not showing up on my screen
SandChigger wrote:Exactly! Take Thang for instance...
Where do you want him taken to?
Freakzilla wrote:It takes a lot more than being a religious nut to get banned around here.
Oh good. :shifty: Does that mean I'm safe? :pray:

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 15:57
by Hunchback Jack
Eyes, you're religious, and you're a nut, but that's not the same thing as a religious nut ;).

HBJ

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 17:58
by lotek
Eyes High wrote:Img not showing up on my screen
Image
:mrgreen:

Re: Marcio Rocha Pereira

Posted: 13 Jun 2010 20:37
by SandChigger
So... so... like, instead of dying in the fall into the Idaho River at the end of GEoD, Moneo falls into a spacetime vortex and is carried back to 20th-century Old Earth, where he sets up an investment firm! Golden balloons for everyone!

The Adventures of Moneo, Wealth Manager of Dune! :lol: