Page 39 of 57

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 16 Sep 2009 06:44
by SadisticCynic
Nebiros wrote:
Nebiros, think you could get SandChigger to join here??

(EDITED BY THE ALMIGHTY MODERATOR)
This time I did not catch what that idiot said. He/she is so naive...
:lol: That one is actually funny!

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 18 Sep 2009 00:40
by Schu
Dammit, DN is down. Where am I going to get some sweet sweet idiodicy now?

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 18 Sep 2009 03:52
by lotek
Schu wrote:Dammit, DN is down. Where am I going to get some sweet sweet idiodicy now?
and I just registered(under the same user name i use here), and strangely enough the forum goes down...

let's do a kanye west on DN lol

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 18 Sep 2009 06:24
by SandChigger
Warning: mysql_connect() [function.mysql-connect]: Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 104 in /data/17/0/142/143/305469/user/310695/htdocs/phpBB2/db/mysql4.php on line 48

Warning: mysql_error(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /data/17/0/142/143/305469/user/310695/htdocs/phpBB2/db/mysql4.php on line 330

Warning: mysql_errno(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /data/17/0/142/143/305469/user/310695/htdocs/phpBB2/db/mysql4.php on line 331
phpBB : Critical Error

Could not connect to the database
Wow, it's getting to be like an annual event, huh? Does this mean Uncle Mike forgot to watch the database size again? :roll:

(My database apps seem to be fine at the moment, so it's not a Network Solutions server problem. Assuming they haven't jumped providers with the snazzy new site upgrade. :laughing: )

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 18 Sep 2009 11:04
by chanilover
Give them a break. The server can only cope with so much stupid before it startes to creak under the strain.

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 18 Sep 2009 11:36
by Omphalos
Schu wrote:Dammit, DN is down. Where am I going to get some sweet sweet idiodicy now?
Honestly, I don't know how you take it. Youre like the king of the dipshits over there.

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 18 Sep 2009 11:45
by Schu
Oh, they were implementing changes. Apparently, hunters and sandworms are part of a new section called the "grand finale" :puke: and winds of dune and paul of dune are now part of a section called heroes of dune, and the rest is Dune, Dune, Dune.

Dune to the Dune of Dune

Omph - I'm truly a sucker for stupidity. It's either there or look at youtube comments :lol:

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 18 Sep 2009 13:00
by DuneFishUK
At least the Cook Book forum survives. The world is safe once more.

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 18 Sep 2009 13:12
by Freakzilla
DuneFishUK wrote:At least the Cook Book forum survives. The world is safe once more.
Thank godness, my kangaroo mouse gumbo recipe is preserved for posterity.

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 19 Sep 2009 07:59
by Nekhrun
Schu wrote:Oh, they were implementing changes. Apparently, hunters and sandworms are part of a new section called the "grand finale" :puke: and winds of dune and paul of dune are now part of a section called heroes of dune
Didn't Byron try to distance himself from the Heroes of Dune title? Now he's got a whole little section for it. He's the worst sell-out of the bunch because he just takes it and takes it and feeds it back to everyone as quality.

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 19 Sep 2009 08:12
by Freakzilla
Nekhrun wrote:
Schu wrote:Oh, they were implementing changes. Apparently, hunters and sandworms are part of a new section called the "grand finale" :puke: and winds of dune and paul of dune are now part of a section called heroes of dune
Didn't Byron try to distance himself from the Heroes of Dune title? Now he's got a whole little section for it. He's the worst sell-out of the bunch because he just takes it and takes it and feeds it back to everyone as quality.
That would have been a good question for DC...

Was the title "Heroes of Dune" meant as sarcasm or irony?

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 19 Sep 2009 09:41
by SandChigger
:laughing:

Christ on Toast, he's got the Board Index set up now to make ours (maybe even 'Keen's :shock: ) look SPARSE. :doh:

My gawd, what a fucking moron.


(And I see E. LeGuille has joined up over there, too. I'm sure he'll be much happier there. :P )

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 19 Sep 2009 09:54
by SandChigger
Oh, and continuing the Fucking Moron Hit Parade!

dunenovels.com Forum Index » DUNE INTERVIEWS AND VIDEOS » Extended Prologue for Lynch Film
Baliset wrote:So it was not the prequels that established that machines conquered the humans.
boardhead wrote:Nope. It never was.
I'm sure you can see where this is going?

Having now viewed the "Extended Prologue", I'm sure we're going to be told, sooner or later, that its version of a machine domination of humans was written by FH for the Lynch film, and/or that they've found his original drafts of that version in the Notes.

Wait for it. :roll:

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 19 Sep 2009 10:09
by Sev
:laughing: Bloody hell, can't he tell when something just looks absurd?? In the brand spanking new (read: empty) Butlerian Jihad forum there are now three of the book covers: the first a mahooosive 10 inches by 7 inches, the third barely 1 inch by 0.5 inches - it's like looking at a scale model of the Sun and the Earth :laughing:

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 19 Sep 2009 14:29
by DuneFishUK
:lol: Good gods! Has he been lurking in the Shrinky thread or something? :P

I always guessed the lack of posts over there was due to lack of boards to post on... :think:

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 19 Sep 2009 14:50
by Tleszer
DuneFishUK wrote:I always guessed the lack of posts over there was due to lack of boards to post on... :think:
:laughing:

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 19 Sep 2009 17:42
by E. LeGuille
I joined for no other reason than just to be there, actually.

It's dead. Why would I be happier there?
No one to contradict and criticize me... how boring.

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 19 Sep 2009 17:49
by Nekhrun
I had a post deleted over there today when someone in the Classic Dune section asked what book he should read next and I told him American Gods.

Looks like only Byron and Poey are able to answer in that thread.

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 20 Sep 2009 06:47
by SandChigger
Wow ... getting really sensitive, isn't he? :roll:


(Are you supposed to consider that a warning, you think? ;) )

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 29 Sep 2009 22:07
by SandChigger
More "musical" fun! :D

dunenovels.com Forum Index » ALL THINGS DUNE » Book Order?
Usal420 wrote:there's really no subconscious depth to BH/KJA, but there is more fun. I wouldn't really try and compare the 2 FH vs BH/KJA, there is a lot of difference. FH seemed to have a message to impart, something that seeps in and never goes away. BH/KJA are just bringing back that universe, so you get more of the characters and story, which is very cool, just not any of the message, that's o k, Frank put enough in himself.
Baliset wrote:I don't mean to moderate here, but is this just another thread of the many that evolved into yet another FH vs BH/KJA thread?
boardadmin wrote:It happens. But we're being civil about it ...which is unique compared to other forums.
OK, so what do we have here?

A moron opining that FH put enough content into his Dune books that it's OK if McDune is content-free. (He's GOT to be an OH sockpuppet, right? :lol: )

A second prissy moron who HASN'T EVEN READ THE ORIGINALS yet whining about something he can't possibly even understand.

And the biggest myron of the piece touting a COMPLETELY ARTIFICIAL & DISHONEST civility that exists only because of his NET NAZI deletions & editing of comments that don't agree with the official HERBERT LEECH PARADE ideology and his own tight-assed idea of "polite discourse". He actually has the gall to criticize "other forums"?! (And you know exactly who he means by that ... but of course he can't say it because the name "Jacurutu" is one of those words he edits out, the stupid fuck! :laughing: )

Ah, it's a good day, today! :D

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 30 Sep 2009 02:22
by lotek
SandChigger wrote: He actually has the gall to criticize "other forums"?! (And you know exactly who he means by that ... but of course he can't say it because the name "Jacurutu" is one of those words he edits out, the stupid fuck! :laughing: )
:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

now that's what I call shooting yourself in the foot!!
Image

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 30 Sep 2009 02:39
by SandChigger
Now THAT is one thing Byron Merritt IS actually good at. :lol:

(Remember Jessica To The Winds of Dune? :laughing: )

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 30 Sep 2009 16:59
by Nekhrun
SandChigger wrote:Now THAT is one thing Byron Merritt IS actually good at. :lol:

(Remember Jessica To The Winds of Dune? :laughing: )
One of my all time favorites. There were a couple of weeks where he seemed to be completely out of the loop. Good work HLP for letting your mouthpiece on the internet twist in the wind like that. :lol:

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 30 Sep 2009 19:38
by SandChigger
Him musta been working too hard in the ER back then, poor baby. :(


(Cheap shot, I know. His work in the hospital is probably the only thing he does of any real value, the only basis for anyone still holding out any kind of respect for him at all.)

Re: posts that I think should be deleted at DN

Posted: 30 Sep 2009 22:01
by SandChigger
EXCELLENCE BEYOND BELIEF!!! :D

LOTS of great news from Dumb Novels, including the reappearance of a slimy old friend! :)

OK, here's the best first:

Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:21 pm Post subject: Re: Why do people hate the new Dune books?
Kickass Kwisatz wrote:
Xianghua wrote:Its only a few people, but seriously, Frank Herbert isn't Jesus or anything.
Exactly! This is my main point against the arguments of people like Nebiros. What is so holy about FH's work that makes him infallible? I mean, I can think of a certain other bearded Dune writer who is much more of a Jesus-like figure in my mind. But I don't want to make this a religious argument.

What I'm really getting at is how the original six books are relatively dull compared to the new adventures. I read them a long time ago once, but I've read Sandworms like twice! I'm in the middle of Winds right now, just got to the part where Bronso and Paul try to see the navigator. Very cool stuff, and it adds a lot to the character of Paul Atreides.
Xianghua wrote:Any more? You can just read your precious books by FH and ignore these. I'd like some of these people I've seen on Amazon.com to come over here. There're only like seven of them.

LOL @seven people! That pretty much settles it. Majority rules, the new Dune books rock! Hey, we should compare the site traffic on this board with wherever it is that they post, just to show them how truly pathetic their little "OH movement" is. Anyone know how to do that?
Um, well, actually Thang has demonstrated how much more active this site is in terms of posts.

That thread is worth a look, because it features both the return of DuneCunt Hypatia (Mmmm, smell the batter rotting!) and another post in a flood by new member "Onasander" (Joined: 27 Sep 2009 Posts: 25 Location: Cincinnatti, Ohio ... N.B. That's the Cincinnatti with two Ts, not the one with only one, where our friend Simon lives!)! He's fairly tedious in this thread, but this, in response to Schu in another one, is PURE GOLD:
Onasander wrote:I would hesitate to use occam's razon on anything, much less science fiction- it's not a function that yields results- if anything, occam's razor is a excuse to dodge the issue and should only be used in scenarios with excelling stupid people who can be mislead away from arguments with such a silly and useless tool. It's a hat trick, and if it's declared, I dislodge it forcefully to the shock and amazement of the declarer- no reason to play by it's rule- has no authentic place in discourse aiming for factual understanding as it is inherently a gamble on methodology- a shot into the unknown launched not in the hopes of being correct- but in the demand it is so. Only a fool could rely on that. [two subsequent paragraphs snipped]
Or how about this, from another thread (FOR LOVERS OF BOTH CLASSIC DUNE AND THE PREQUELS » Question about dates (Butlerian Jihad)):
Onasander wrote:Let it be known, AD is not AD as we know it, but rather, stands for 'After Douche'- a douche so terrible that existed in the far future that everyone decided to reject the old calendar (among man things), and focusing on the date of his death as dayone of the new calendar. It is not known how far apart the dune AD and our present day is separated..... all we can be sure of, is what a douchebag he must of been.
Words fail me. :shock:

It literally is becoming a smorgasbord of STUPID over there. I'd laugh my ass off if it weren't that it's supposed to be the official website representing Frank Herbert's legacy. :(