Re: Marty & Daniel: "Stop spying on us!"
Posted: 13 Dec 2011 22:43
Ix and it's robots? 

DUNE DISCUSSION FORUM FOR ORTHODOX HERBERTARIANS
http://www.jacurutu.com/
Let that one slideFreakzilla wrote:Ix and it's robots?
Happens to the best of us sadly. I haven't read more than a few words in a row that they wrote for years now and it still messes with me.Freakzilla wrote:You're right, it's just hard for me to let stuff like that pass. It's McDune contamination.
While I'm for giving him the benefit of the doubt, I think it's important to point out these slip-ups. It's fucking insidious how these types of details slip into some of the newer readers' minds. Especially those who've read them all in a relatively short period of time. Most of us read FH's books many times, years before McDune. I can see if I'd run through them all once in the span of a few years that some of those things could happen.Freakzilla wrote:You're right, it's just hard for me to let stuff like that pass. It's McDune contamination.
Inquisition ?Nekhrun wrote: We need to keep people pure.
of course, Ix and its robots, isn't it obvious that Marty and Daniel were thinking machines all along? Just playin, yeah, that ones my fault, i automatically conflated Ix with the Bulterian Jihad. Btw, no need to treat me with kid gloves either, never been accused of being sensitive, oh, i guess now would be an ideal time to mention that i just dropped a novel on the "Sheeana's vision" thread. Feel free to tear it apart, i'm just happy gleaning new things from the Dune Universe that i didn't know before.Freakzilla wrote:Ix and it's robots?
As I just posted in the other thread where this came up again (I saw that one first), what would the super hunter-seekers (even though Leto prevented them) be but a form of autonomous robot? I have no problem with the Ixians having assembly type robots and automation. Otherwise, what would "supreme in machine culture" mean? (Machine culture = machine way of thinking?)FH in The Terminology of the Imperium wrote:IX: see Richese.
RICHESE: fourth planet of Eridani A, classed with Ix as supreme in machine culture. Noted for miniaturization. (For a detailed study on how Richese and lx escaped the more severe effects of the Butlerian Jihad, see The Last Jihad by Sumer and Kautman.)
Secret, automated production lines are far more Duniverse-plausible than a never-otherwise-mentioned House Major ruling Ix.FH in GEoD wrote:"And you do not fear the lxians' machine?" Anteac insisted.
"Is automation synonymous with conscious intelligence?" he asked.
It was most definitly a robot.Slugger wrote:I'm away from my books, so I can't look it up, but: Who produced that receptionist automata Odrade and party encounters while waiting for the HM at Junction? Wouldn't that be considered a type of robot?
Sure they could have been but the Guilds only open adoption of technology extended to the Ixian Navigation Machines, I can't see their gain in such a menial flaunting of the prohibitions. Petty shit was the domain of the HM.Freakzilla wrote:It was most definitly a robot.Slugger wrote:I'm away from my books, so I can't look it up, but: Who produced that receptionist automata Odrade and party encounters while waiting for the HM at Junction? Wouldn't that be considered a type of robot?
I don't believe it was mentioned who manufactured the robo-servants but Odrade did note that the comeyes had the look of something from The Scattering. However, it was originally a Guild building and they could have been an artifact of the Old Empire.
But would Ix have lost control of these or set them upon humanity to destroy as they were intended? But either way is still different than McDune shit.SandChigger wrote:Didn't say we did. I'm just saying that I don't necessarily see this as McDune contamination. Had it been phrased "Ix and its super hunter-seekers", would you have jumped on it?
Do you mean this quote:SandChigger wrote:I thought the implication, of the "all machines eventually break down" bit, was that they malfunctioned and ran amok...
Yes but It's a really fine line. These things were built in the first place. I mean we built the atom bomb so we had to use it, right? Leto does say that Ix can no longer create arafel, which implies action on their part be it the actual creation of the hunter seekers or the malfunction itself. He is blaming humans, not the machines.SandChigger wrote:I thought the implication, of the "all machines eventually break down" bit, was that they malfunctioned and ran amok...
Since the machine was a hunter-seeker, it was naturally a weapon and its purpose was to kill, so yes, someone would have used it. And since it was designed to improve itself, it would become better and better at killing. By "fail" Leto of course means "malfunction", not "cease to operate"."The lxians contemplated making a weapon—a type of hunter-seeker, self-propelled death with a machine mind. It was to be designed as a self improving thing which would seek out life and reduce that life to its inorganic matter."
"I have not heard of this thing, Lord."
"I know that. The lxians do not recognize that machine makers always run the risk of becoming totally machine. This is ultimate sterility. Machines always fail...given time. And when these machines failed there would be nothing left, no life at all."
I've always read that as the Ixians creating some type of nanobots and the situation went Gray Goo (think Beserkers of von Neumann probes).SandChigger wrote:"The lxians contemplated making a weapon—a type of hunter-seeker, self-propelled death with a machine mind. It was to be designed as a self improving thing which would seek out life and reduce that life to its inorganic matter."
V'ger?SandChigger wrote: I'm always reminded by this of the NOMAD (sp?) probe in that original Star Trek episode: it collided with an alien probe and the two rebuilt themselves into one, with a deadly new interpretation of their original "seek out and analyze alien life."