I thought that was a nice touch. CH,SandChigger wrote:I'm sorry, but...all this fuss over someone who didn't know or recognize the word "sietch"?
Please....

Moderators: Freakzilla, ᴶᵛᵀᴬ, Omphalos
He would have no fair excuse to put us down at DN, no example of us being (allegedly) close-minded.TheDukester wrote:Better off? Why? I'm being serious here. In what ways, exactly, would we be "better off"?Lundse wrote:... we would all be better of welcoming his inputs and then ignoring it when they dried up.
You know what I mean - maybe he did not want to try to discuss with people who question his motives and call him idiot. I wouldn't either, in the long run.TheDukester wrote:He left of his own accord. Big difference.Lundse wrote:... driven him off
Again, a number of people responded in a civil fashion, myself included (I wound enjoy talking about the new series of audiobooks with someone). And, again, it was at this point that he chose to leave. Strange, huh?TheDukester wrote:Lundse wrote:How about telling the guy why you feel as you feel instead of just chewing him out because he does not feel the same?
As I said, I think this is probably misrepresenting his reasons, and I do not really blame him for leaving. But it is a lot of fuss over nothing...TheDukester wrote:My God, all of this worry over a guy who is either a ringer or else some incredibly sensitive goober who left right when he heard "welcome."
And is something stopping him from coming back here? No? I didn't think so.
Re. BK's own involvement and choice to leave, then I do not think we will agree. I do not find his actions here damning, nor do I blame him for leavning.GamePlayer wrote:Okay, let's get some perspective here.
The guy is now gone, so all bets are off. He's run wild indicting everyone here for a "bad experience" in which he made every effort to worsen and didn't lift a finger to improve. HE DIDN'T EVEN TRY! That alone speak volumes; the circumstances are irrelevant at that point.
I'd also ask, where's the personal responsibility? Why the hell doesn't a Dune fan know what "seitch" means? Going a step further, the guy spends all of a day in our forum and figures he's expert enough to badmouth Jacurutu, declaring "fanatic", spouting crap about how awful the place is and EVERYONE in it...because he's a "Dune fan" that was laughed at when he didn't know what a "seitch" was. Are you fucking kidding me? I know a fella that acts like that, claiming everyone with a harsh opinion of him/his work is a terrorist...
Next, the "paranoia" issue. Honestly, I'd have to give a shit to be paranoid and I don't. But just so we're clear, we have the admin of Dumbnovels admitting he lurks Dune fan forums so he can ban bad members. That's not OUR "paranoia"; that's called a disturbed cyber stalking administrator of a failing message board.
Truth is, there isn't a lot here for prequel fans: that's the point. If you want to praise the prequels, adore KJA and talk up BH, there's Dumbnovels and author blawgs. We can't praise Frank Herbert and denounce prequels on DN, so we have Jacurutu. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
No apologies. Remember the wise words of RATM: anger is a gift
Today's post should convince all & lay bare the plan.Bearded Kirklander wrote:On this particular site, I think a "Turn The Other Cheek" policy by OH (Canon) members who vehemently oppose non-canon works would be welcome, and respectful.
There are other places that are not official and are not actually run and supported by family members and sanctioned authors, and it would seem to be more appropriate to publicly air their grievances at those other sites instead of doing so here.
My perception of the official site is that it should be a Safe Haven for fans of the Dune universe who may not wish to differentiate between Canon and Non-Canon works.
This site may also be different because it is not only a place for discussion, but for promotion of the entire line of Dune material. There is a commercial component involved, and I feel that should be understood and factored in as well.
If people choose to participate here, I believe that it should be with those caveats and boundaries in mind.
Those who do not wish to recognize those limits are free, at any time, to start their own sites with their own rules. A place where they can express their concerns and even their outrage in a public venue. A place where they can decide who is welcome and who is not, what comments are welcome and what comments are not, all without having to acknowledge any commercial or familial interests.
Just one man's take on it.
Happy reading.
I welcome anyone who wants to discuss Dune but if they want to argue that the new books are anywhere near the same class as FH's they're in for an uphill battle.Lundse wrote:Re. Jacurutu as not a place for prequelites...
True. But I will do my best not to antagonize them if they pop by, all the same. Still hoping against hope to have that proper discussion with one of them...
Exactly... As much as I despise the prequels, I don't think its right to antagonize every NuDune fan that comes along. Hell, I'll talk about why the prequels/sequels suck with them, but i will do it pointedly and civilly. I think I was the first to question BK's motives on DN, but I had good reason to. However, unless there is proof of such accusations, its safe to assume he's innocent.Lundse wrote: Re. Jacurutu as not a place for prequelites...
True. But I will do my best not to antagonize them if they pop by, all the same. Still hoping against hope to have that proper discussion with one of them...
As long as we're being honest, I gotta say ... this doesn't bother me at all. Not one bit.Baraka Bryan wrote:... they'll label us fanatics and despise our views.
Slow down people! We can't have three people being level headed all at once, this place might implode!Baraka Bryan wrote:Drunken Idaho wrote:Exactly... As much as I despise the prequels, I don't think its right to antagonize every NuDune fan that comes along. Hell, I'll talk about why the prequels/sequels suck with them, but i will do it pointedly and civilly. I think I was the first to question BK's motives on DN, but I had good reason to. However, unless there is proof of such accusations, its safe to assume he's innocent.Lundse wrote: Re. Jacurutu as not a place for prequelites...
True. But I will do my best not to antagonize them if they pop by, all the same. Still hoping against hope to have that proper discussion with one of them...
i agree.... if people simply come off as haters everytime someone comes in saying that those books have even some merit they'll label us fanatics and despise our views. being welcoming and telling them here are the 1000s of examples of mistakes / contradictions / retardedness in the nu-books they'll be more apt to see the truth and be forced to restrain their hatred like us
Freakzilla wrote:I thought that was a nice touch. CH,SandChigger wrote:I'm sorry, but...all this fuss over someone who didn't know or recognize the word "sietch"?
Please....
boardadmin wrote:I think they should try and stick to Frank's vision of Dune. It was basically a desolate backwater planet that just happened to have the most valuable substance in the universe on it. That was the only reason anyone gave a damn about the place. That's the only reason Arrakeen was built. And it would've been a functional city, not audacious in any way (until Alia and Paul started building).Muad'Dib56 wrote:The movies picture arrakeen(during Muad'Dibs years as emperor) as all, ancient. I picture Arrakeen with an ancient style, but mixed with modern, like projectors showing commercials, stores selling technological gadgets, groundcars, and that stuff...
Dont u agree?
Yeah, but seriously, when was the last time someone called you an idiot?Lundse wrote:You know what I mean - maybe he did not want to try to discuss with people who question his motives and call him idiot. I wouldn't either, in the long run.
It's kinda like a game sometimes, I always try to guess which ones will get deleted and how quickly. A sad, sad game.SandRider wrote:Amazing. I just watched Bryon kill a post with my own eyes.
I spotted it earlier, a new user with one post and a well-laid out
and familar argument about the "canon" issue with the new books.
I thought, well, that won't stand.
Went over a minute ago, and saw boredadmin .....
Went to the thread - there's that post ....
Hit refresh - post is gone
I'm not mad anymore, guys ....
Just amused ...
Thanks for the education...
Cheers!TheDukester wrote:Or grow a pair. Either way.