Page 54 of 63

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 26 Nov 2010 03:24
by SandRider
say merk, off the top of your head, what do you know about the pink snow in Utah ?

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 26 Nov 2010 04:08
by merkin muffley
SandRider wrote:say merk, off the top of your head, what do you know about the pink snow in Utah ?
:think: :?: :?

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 26 Nov 2010 11:33
by merkin muffley
The pink snow reference is still totally over my head. :oops:

:confusion-confused:

Image
:obscene-tolietcrapper:
Image
:obscene-tolietpush:
Image
:obscene-tolietclaw:

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 26 Nov 2010 23:11
by SandChigger
:laughing-rolling:

Who started that thread? Or do I need to ask? :lol:

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 01:08
by Crysknife
SandRider wrote:say merk, off the top of your head, what do you know about the pink snow in Utah ?
Pink snow in Utah? :think:

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 03:12
by merkin muffley
SandChigger wrote::laughing-rolling:

Who started that thread? Or do I need to ask? :lol:
It was Indrid...

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 03:54
by Omphalos
SandRider wrote:say merk, off the top of your head, what do you know about the pink snow in Utah ?
Obscure Kubrick reference?

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 06:36
by merkin muffley
Omphalos wrote:
SandRider wrote:say merk, off the top of your head, what do you know about the pink snow in Utah ?
Obscure Kubrick reference?
:shock: Oh my God. Shishi.

At the end of The Shining, Jack Torrance got lost chasing Danny and his wife through the maze behind the Overlook, and before he froze to death, he made shishi and bled into the snow, leaving behind the sign of the Illuminati in pink, leaking all the way south into Utah.

Hence, The Shishining. Coincidence? I think not. :shock:

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 12:07
by merkin muffley
Im WG Duneit! wrote: Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 44
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 10:24 am
Post subject: Non FH Dune books
boardadmin wrote:
Crysknife wrote:
If you really want to understand the debate, you have to see where some of the older fans are coming from. Imagine being a fan for decades and then someone other than the original author decides to take Dune in a direction you didn't see or want. It can get heated, but don't let that stop you.

Well said.

That's fine, but that doesn't describe my objections to the new books.

We're discussing the issue of quality, and new books vs. old, so I'm assuming I'm allowed to express my opinion about this here without getting deleted or banned. We'll see.

If Brian and Kevin had done something interesting with the new books, I would have been fine with inconsistencies. Whether or not the new books are canon is not so important to me, personally. My own tastes would have allowed for some changes, if new authors wanted to take Dune in an interesting new direction.

My favorite book in the series is Dune Messiah because it takes the characters to unexpected, interesting, and sometimes very dark, new places.

My problem with the new books is that they are really badly written. They're unbelievably mediocre. They're full of cardboard characters, sophomoric humor, tired sci-fi cliches, and devoid of interesting ideas. The prose is awkward and passive. The books read like bad Star Wars or Star Trek novelizations for tweens.

I was excited for the new books. I tried to read Butlerian Jihad and Paul of Dune. I wasn't able to finish either of them, and Paul of Dune is one of the worst books I've ever read.

You might have a different experience when you try to read the new books. It was a huge let down for me, but not because I was offended that the new authors are so different from Frank Herbert. For me, the problem was in the quality of the writing.

If the quality of the writing matters to you, these new books are going to be difficult, in my opinion.
_________________
"But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother."

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 12:20
by Freakzilla
That's going to go over well.

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 12:42
by merkin muffley
Freakzilla wrote:That's going to go over well.
:banana-rock:

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 12:46
by Freakzilla
I'm on the other end of the hate spectrum though, I'd have tolerated the bad writing if they had been 100% faithful to the originals. But since their accuracy sucks the bad writing is just a bonus.

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 13:57
by merkin muffley
Freakzilla wrote:I'm on the other end of the hate spectrum though, I'd have tolerated the bad writing if they had been 100% faithful to the originals. But since their accuracy sucks the bad writing is just a bonus.

I would've been disappointed with books that were 100% faithful, but were written with KJA/BH quality.

The inconsistencies, though, are also a huge problem for me because they usually represent a blatant disregard for everything Frank Herbert's books stood for, is also big problem for me. Cheesy, hackneyed, cliched writing itself is a betrayal of Frank Herbert, in my opinion.

Something like the "Irulan wrote Dune" thing is horrible writing partly because it's a huge change made for the stupidest possible reasons - so that Paul can join the fucking circus, and shit. The kinds of inconsistencies in Paul of Dune demonstrate a contempt for the original books, which fuels my active hatred of what they're doing with the new books.

So, the bad writing and the inconsistency are both integral parts of the same shittiness. But the bad writing has made it impossible for me to even finish any of the new books. And I've tried. I've been trying to read those goddamned books since they first started coming out, and had no idea that anyone else felt the same as I did until I joined this website about a year ago.

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 14:07
by Freakzilla
You're right, but I wasn't expecting anything in that regard so I wasn't as upset as with their lack of understanding or caring.

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 17:19
by SandRider
Omphalos wrote:
SandRider wrote:say merk, off the top of your head, what do you know about the pink snow in Utah ?
Obscure Kubrick reference?
ah, sorta ... everytime I see clips of above-ground tests, I am reminded that the fallout from
Indian Springs drifted east into Utah, got caught up in the clouds and came back down as
pink snow --- in the 50s, kids would run out and play in it, eat it ... the government said
pink snow was not harmful ...

http://www.radiationcontrol.utah.gov/fallout.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://historytogo.utah.gov/utah_chapte ... nders.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Image Image
Image

http://www.falloutradiation.com/file.ph ... IIoCGI.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"THYROID NODULARITY IN SOUTHWESTERN UTAH SCHOOL CHILDREN EXPOSED TO FALLOUT RADIATION, Feb. 1971"
http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/re ... /2/241.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


just some of that randomness that's stuck in my head ...

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 20:23
by Crysknife
merkin muffley wrote:
Im WG Duneit! wrote: Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 44
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 10:24 am
Post subject: Non FH Dune books
boardadmin wrote:
Crysknife wrote:
If you really want to understand the debate, you have to see where some of the older fans are coming from. Imagine being a fan for decades and then someone other than the original author decides to take Dune in a direction you didn't see or want. It can get heated, but don't let that stop you.

Well said.

That's fine, but that doesn't describe my objections to the new books.

We're discussing the issue of quality, and new books vs. old, so I'm assuming I'm allowed to express my opinion about this here without getting deleted or banned. We'll see.

If Brian and Kevin had done something interesting with the new books, I would have been fine with inconsistencies. Whether or not the new books are canon is not so important to me, personally. My own tastes would have allowed for some changes, if new authors wanted to take Dune in an interesting new direction.

My favorite book in the series is Dune Messiah because it takes the characters to unexpected, interesting, and sometimes very dark, new places.

My problem with the new books is that they are really badly written. They're unbelievably mediocre. They're full of cardboard characters, sophomoric humor, tired sci-fi cliches, and devoid of interesting ideas. The prose is awkward and passive. The books read like bad Star Wars or Star Trek novelizations for tweens.

I was excited for the new books. I tried to read Butlerian Jihad and Paul of Dune. I wasn't able to finish either of them, and Paul of Dune is one of the worst books I've ever read.

You might have a different experience when you try to read the new books. It was a huge let down for me, but not because I was offended that the new authors are so different from Frank Herbert. For me, the problem was in the quality of the writing.

If the quality of the writing matters to you, these new books are going to be difficult, in my opinion.
_________________
"But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother."
Merk, I pretty much agree with you, but I just want the new readers to remember to read the originals first. I think many will come to the same conclusions that all of us have if they do it this way. That's all I was trying to say. The new books are their own worst enemy. And if that guy happens to like the new books, well, more power to him and his couple of brain cells.

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 21:30
by merkin muffley
SandRider wrote: ah, sorta ... everytime I see clips of above-ground tests, I am reminded that the fallout from
Indian Springs drifted east into Utah, got caught up in the clouds and came back down as
pink snow --- in the 50s, kids would run out and play in it, eat it ... the government said
pink snow was not harmful ...
Aha! Interesting, I never heard of that before.
Crysknife wrote: Merk, I pretty much agree with you, but I just want the new readers to remember to read the originals first.
That's cool, I didn't realize the Crysknives were the same person. What you said on DN is totally reasonable. Keep in mind, my goal over there is to be as much of an asshole as possible. I really wasn't directing it at you. :D

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 27 Nov 2010 22:59
by SandChigger
SandRider wrote:the fallout from Indian Springs drifted east into Utah, got caught up in the clouds and came back down as pink snow --- in the 50s, kids would run out and play in it, eat it ... the government said pink snow was not harmful ...

Image
KEWL... Glow-in-the-Dark Mormons! :lol:


Sounds like a government plot to eliminate a religious (cough cough) minority! I wonder if Marilyn knows! :lol:

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 28 Nov 2010 01:38
by Crysknife
merkin muffley wrote:
SandRider wrote: ah, sorta ... everytime I see clips of above-ground tests, I am reminded that the fallout from
Indian Springs drifted east into Utah, got caught up in the clouds and came back down as
pink snow --- in the 50s, kids would run out and play in it, eat it ... the government said
pink snow was not harmful ...
Aha! Interesting, I never heard of that before.
Crysknife wrote: Merk, I pretty much agree with you, but I just want the new readers to remember to read the originals first.
That's cool, I didn't realize the Crysknives were the same person. What you said on DN is totally reasonable. Keep in mind, my goal over there is to be as much of an asshole as possible. I really wasn't directing it at you. :D
I get you.....I tried that a while ago and got banned. I asked Byron to let me rejoin a few months ago if I promised to be at least a civil as Freak. :mrgreen:

I just couldn't stand to see stupid arguments made about the B Jihad on a board where new fans might lurk. I made the point to Byron that my views are as valid as any fan and therefore as much a part of Dune as his or anyone's and as long as I kept it civil he would let me debate. Besides, Hyppo hasn't been around to set me off :cat fight:

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 28 Nov 2010 03:46
by SandChigger
Crysknife wrote:I asked Byron to let me rejoin
...

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 28 Nov 2010 04:24
by SandRider
and the bitch actually responded ??

which reminds me, he hasn't responded to my request to remove my username from his membership ...

next stop, every Dune/McDune/Wingnut SciFi forum @amazon.com ...

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 28 Nov 2010 05:39
by SandChigger
Crysknife wrote:I asked Byron to let me rejoin
...

:tissue2:

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 28 Nov 2010 09:36
by merkin muffley
SandChigger wrote:
Crysknife wrote:I asked Byron to let me rejoin
...

:tissue2:
Yeah, I can't say I see the point of that.

The level of censorship over there is so ridiculous that there isn't any discussion or debate allowed, anyway. What's the point of trying to participate in that forum in good faith when it's the kind of place where passive aggressive ass-kiss Arnoldo can flourish because he's protected? Besides, it's so easy to get in there with a proxy.

Granted, there's really no point to what I'm doing (starting threads about wiping your ass), either... :P

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 28 Nov 2010 11:37
by Nekhrun
merkin muffley wrote:...there's really no point to what I'm doing (starting threads about wiping your ass), either... :P
It has about as much to do with Dune as anything else they do over there. Also you have the best reason for doing it that a person can have, it's funny.

Re: posts that I think will get deleted at DN

Posted: 28 Nov 2010 12:24
by TheDukester
Crysknife wrote:I asked Byron to let me rejoin ...
Utterly pointless.