KWISATZ HADERACH


Moderators: Omphalos, Freakzilla, ᴶᵛᵀᴬ

Post Reply
User avatar
Harq al Ada
Posts: 122
Joined: 11 Oct 2009 23:00
Location: Mormon country, AZ

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Harq al Ada »

thank you again. it's all starting to come back to me.

I haven't had anyone to talk to about the books in a long time. Only been able to rant now and again when people tell me how much the SciFi channel's rape of Dune was better than Lynch's adaptation.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
Arrrmanda
Posts: 107
Joined: 29 Sep 2009 19:03

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Arrrmanda »

Harq al Ada wrote:Only been able to rant now and again when people tell me how much the SciFi channel's rape of Dune was better than Lynch's adaptation.
Them's fightin' words sir. :x
User avatar
Harq al Ada
Posts: 122
Joined: 11 Oct 2009 23:00
Location: Mormon country, AZ

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Harq al Ada »

I've got some boxing gloves and this looks like a fair ring.

just because the SciFi channel was able to shove, hammer, and cram in more scenes doesn't mean it was better.

their "adaptation" may have been based on this, if they even bothered to do that.
Image

acting, directing, special effects, the sets, and the costume design (the Guild [were they from France?], Saudakar [we're tough in our floppy hats], and Harkonnen designs were particularly hilarious) were just a few of the problems I had with SciFi's version of Dune.

More: Paul a spoiled brat??? Lack of still suits (EFFIN'! HEELS ON THE WOMEN'S SUITS!) and random use of them, open air sietches (Hello? *knock! knock!* Water discipline?), lovable rhyming Baron??? waaaaay too much emotion shown by Jessica, Paul, and Leto, and Irulan (WHAT THE HELL WAS THAT?). They treated Gurney like he was a lumbering buffoon. You barely noticed Yueh at all. The lack of character development given the length of the thing was amazing. They turned these beautifully thought out characters into caricatures. Horrible.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
Freakzilla
Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
Posts: 18454
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Contact:

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Freakzilla »

I didn't know Robbie the Robot was in Dune! WTF?
Image
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman
User avatar
Harq al Ada
Posts: 122
Joined: 11 Oct 2009 23:00
Location: Mormon country, AZ

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Harq al Ada »

you have to read in between the lines really really hard but he's in there.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
Arrrmanda
Posts: 107
Joined: 29 Sep 2009 19:03

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Arrrmanda »

Harq al Ada wrote:acting, directing, special effects, the sets, and the costume design (the Guild [were they from France?], Saudakar [we're tough in our floppy hats], and Harkonnen designs were particularly hilarious) were just a few of the problems I had with SciFi's version of Dune.

More: Paul a spoiled brat??? Lack of still suits (EFFIN'! HEELS ON THE WOMEN'S SUITS!) and random use of them, open air sietches (Hello? *knock! knock!* Water discipline?), lovable rhyming Baron??? waaaaay too much emotion shown by Jessica, Paul, and Leto, and Irulan (WHAT THE HELL WAS THAT?). They treated Gurney like he was a lumbering buffoon. You barely noticed Yueh at all. The lack of character development given the length of the thing was amazing. They turned these beautifully thought out characters into caricatures. Horrible.
And this is some how worse than what David Lynch did?
User avatar
trang
Posts: 1224
Joined: 06 May 2008 18:59
Location: Hot Tub Time Machine

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by trang »

As as fan of both the lynch and the sci fi series version, they are both bad... its just the dimension you wish to go I think.

The Lynch version got the Epic feel to it, the rest was his "Visual Artist" interpretation. Frank was on the Lynch project and there is 30 or 40 mintues of audio (lynch talks for about 10 minutes) about the hows, whys, and do's of this version. The Storyboard addition/cut scenes added int he 3 hour plus version is a little better but still bad in a comparison sense.

The Dune and COD versions on Sci-Fi were bad in many different ways, there is a book out that details the production of the 2001 dune, I have it, but its in storage at the moment (Real life is turmoil mess at the moment), but the few pages I read into it seemed to give insight.

Anything Visual Dune is appealing, be it art, motion, or otherwise. Audio is also cool. It just adds to the experience.

Hopefully someday someone will dedicate themselves, have enough money, time, and dedication to bring a true epic rendering of the entire original series.
"Long Live the Fighters", "Dragon.....the other white meat."

Image
User avatar
Seraphan
Posts: 749
Joined: 03 Jul 2008 08:36
Location: Right Behind You!

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Seraphan »

Both adaptations ridiculed Voice, the movie had exagerated and too theatrical acting, scenes were crammed.
The mini series had sandworms that growled, some acting would've been better if pieces of wood had made it into the cast. Certain character roles were changed obviously because of the actors/actresses in play (Irulan and Wencicia).
And it was amazing how many people lived in Arrakis but didnt have the eyes of the ibad. Something of wich, both adaptations also failed to portray correctly.
Image
"The beginning of knowledge is the discovery of something we do not understand." - Frank Herbert
“This tutoring is dialectical. Literature makes us better noticers of life; we get to practice on life itself; which in turn makes us better readers of detail in literature; which in turn makes us better readers of life. And so on and on.” - James Wood
User avatar
A Thing of Eternity
Posts: 6090
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
Location: Calgary Alberta

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by A Thing of Eternity »

To be honest I am looking forward to the new Dune movie, even if it just gives me something to complain about. Obviously I love that the idiot director is off the project, and I hope DEARLY that the hack is involved in as little a way as possible.
Image
Slugger
Posts: 158
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 20:13

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Slugger »

I enjoyed the two miniseries. The music from CoD rocks, too. They're pretty good to get people introduced to Dune.
User avatar
Redstar
Posts: 1202
Joined: 25 Feb 2009 04:13

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Redstar »

Freakzilla wrote:I didn't know Robbie the Robot was in Dune! WTF?
Old joke!
User avatar
Hunchback Jack
Posts: 1983
Joined: 30 May 2008 15:02
Location: California, USA

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Hunchback Jack »

Freakzilla wrote:I didn't know Robbie the Robot was in Dune! WTF?
Maybe that's depicting one of the "other works".

:)

HBJ
"The sky calls to us. If we do not destroy ourselves, we will one day venture to the stars."
- Carl Sagan

I'm still very proud of The Quarry but … let's face it; in the end the real best way to sign off would have been with a great big rollicking Culture novel.
- Iain Banks
User avatar
Mandy
Cat Herder
Posts: 1704
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 20:18
Contact:

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Mandy »

Ick.. I thought the Lynch movie and the SciFi mini series sucked, but tbh I don't think I'd like any Dune movie. Nothing can compete with the books.
As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hypatia approaches one.
User avatar
Harq al Ada
Posts: 122
Joined: 11 Oct 2009 23:00
Location: Mormon country, AZ

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Harq al Ada »

Arrrmanda wrote:
Harq al Ada wrote:acting, directing, special effects, the sets, and the costume design (the Guild [were they from France?], Saudakar [we're tough in our floppy hats], and Harkonnen designs were particularly hilarious) were just a few of the problems I had with SciFi's version of Dune.

More: Paul a spoiled brat??? Lack of still suits (EFFIN'! HEELS ON THE WOMEN'S SUITS!) and random use of them, open air sietches (Hello? *knock! knock!* Water discipline?), lovable rhyming Baron??? waaaaay too much emotion shown by Jessica, Paul, and Leto, and Irulan (WHAT THE HELL WAS THAT?). They treated Gurney like he was a lumbering buffoon. You barely noticed Yueh at all. The lack of character development given the length of the thing was amazing. They turned these beautifully thought out characters into caricatures. Horrible.
And this is some how worse than what David Lynch did?
gods yes! things that were better in '84: the acting, costume design, direction, music, character depth, visually it was beautiful... Lynch didn't have final cut and it has the feel of movie execs wanting an action flick. I didn't ever find it confusing at all when I first saw it as a wee lad. It's a movie adaptation and the few things that Lynch did adapt I have much less problem with than SciFi's version. However! I do think the 2000 version's special effects might be as good as '84. And again, I haven't seed their version of CoD.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
Redstar
Posts: 1202
Joined: 25 Feb 2009 04:13

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Redstar »

Harq al Ada wrote:that were better in '84: the acting, costume design, direction, music, character depth, visually it was beautiful... Lynch didn't have final cut and it has the feel of movie execs wanting an action flick. I didn't ever find it confusing at all when I first saw it as a wee lad. It's a movie adaptation and the few things that Lynch did adapt I have much less problem with than SciFi's version. However! I do think the 2000 version's special effects might be as good as '84. And again, I haven't seed their version of CoD.
If they're "as good" as the '84 film, then they're crap. The special effects look like they hired an online kid animator. And the dunes! Oh god, the dunes...
User avatar
A Thing of Eternity
Posts: 6090
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
Location: Calgary Alberta

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by A Thing of Eternity »

Those effects were top of the line in the day. Dated now, but when you know what went into them compared to what goes into effects now a days they are quite impressive.
Image
User avatar
Harq al Ada
Posts: 122
Joined: 11 Oct 2009 23:00
Location: Mormon country, AZ

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Harq al Ada »

Redstar wrote:
Harq al Ada wrote:that were better in '84: the acting, costume design, direction, music, character depth, visually it was beautiful... Lynch didn't have final cut and it has the feel of movie execs wanting an action flick. I didn't ever find it confusing at all when I first saw it as a wee lad. It's a movie adaptation and the few things that Lynch did adapt I have much less problem with than SciFi's version. However! I do think the 2000 version's special effects might be as good as '84. And again, I haven't seed their version of CoD.
If they're "as good" as the '84 film, then they're crap. The special effects look like they hired an online kid animator. And the dunes! Oh god, the dunes...
no, I said they might be as good as '84.



this is where some of those dunes were made...

on location Samalayuca Dunes
Image

A Thing of Eternity wrote:Those effects were top of the line in the day. Dated now, but when you know what went into them compared to what goes into effects now a days they are quite impressive.
I agree
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
Redstar
Posts: 1202
Joined: 25 Feb 2009 04:13

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Redstar »

Harq al Ada wrote:
Redstar wrote:If they're "as good" as the '84 film, then they're crap. The special effects look like they hired an online kid animator. And the dunes! Oh god, the dunes...
no, I said they might be as good as '84.
Exactly. A film made in 2000, 16 years of special effects advancement and after Jurassic-freakin'-Park, should not be equal to its predecessor.

I should specify, but by "dunes", I meant the crappy mounds of sand with a painted backdrop... :hand:
User avatar
Harq al Ada
Posts: 122
Joined: 11 Oct 2009 23:00
Location: Mormon country, AZ

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Harq al Ada »

Redstar wrote:
Harq al Ada wrote:
Redstar wrote:If they're "as good" as the '84 film, then they're crap. The special effects look like they hired an online kid animator. And the dunes! Oh god, the dunes...
no, I said they might be as good as '84.
Exactly. A film made in 2000, 16 years of special effects advancement and after Jurassic-freakin'-Park, should not be equal to its predecessor.

I should specify, but by "dunes", I meant the crappy mounds of sand with a painted backdrop... :hand:
that's what I was saying, it's not equal. almost as good. are you sure you're not thinking of scifi's dunes? they were god awful, I laughed when I first saw them.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
Redstar
Posts: 1202
Joined: 25 Feb 2009 04:13

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Redstar »

I'm thinking of what I typed.
User avatar
TheDukester
Posts: 3808
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 13:44
Location: Operation Enduring Bacon

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by TheDukester »

Harq al Ada wrote:Only been able to rant now and again when people tell me how much the SciFi channel's rape of Dune was better than Lynch's adaptation.
It was better. By miles.

Then again, it's a bit of an apples-and-oranges comparison. Lynch's Dune had nothing to do with Dune; it had everything to do with David Lynch. It's self-indulgent drivel of the first degree. It's virtually unwatchable. In fact, just thinking about it is making me ... a bit ... oh noes!

Weirding modules: :puke:

Kyle MacLachlan's hair: :puke:

Fremen sticking a plug up everyone's nose, yet leaving the rest of the head and neck uncovered: :puke:

Heart-plugs: :puke:

The cartoon Harkonnen: :puke:

Sting: ... well, wait, I actually sort of liked Sting.
"Anything I write will be remembered and listed in bibliographies on Dune for several hundred years ..." — some delusional halfwit troll.
User avatar
Freakzilla
Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
Posts: 18454
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Contact:

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Freakzilla »

Don't forget the cat milking.
Image
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman
RedHeadKevin
Posts: 66
Joined: 13 Feb 2009 19:45

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by RedHeadKevin »

I've gotta defend David Lynch a little here:
While I HATE the wierding modules, they were an interesting depiction of The Wierding Way. Think about it: Lynch needed a way to tie in the BG training (especially The Voice) with the Atreides army, and later the Fremen, without a character looking at the fighting and actually saying "Boy, these are the best fighters in the universe. It must be that Bene Gesserit training." Using a mechanical means to amplify and apply The Voice for non-BG characters was a solution. Except for a few scenes, the WM's could be swapped out for lasguns or other weapons, with no real difference to the film.

I also wish he had stillsuit hoods. BUT, think about the actors, and how they would look on film. If you had all of them covered in hoods, with only thier eyes showing, there would be practically no way to know who's who. Nearly any movie that has characters in that type of costume (breath mask and helmet/hood) finds another way around it. Top Gun: the pilots all had different helmet markings (including their name.) Iron Eagle: 1 black guy, 1 white guy. The Abyss: clear helmets that clearly show the actor's entire face. With most other movies with masked characters, it doesn't make any difference who the individual characters are (think the Stormtroopers in Star Wars.) Even if you had MOST of the Fremen in hoods, Stilgar, Chani, Paul, Jessica, etc would spend most of the time hoodless and maskless, just so you could tell who was who. Plus, rubber hoods would probably kill a bunch of actors filming in the desert.

As for the cat milking? I got nothing. That was just Lynch being effed up.
I don't recommend anyone drink their thigh pad water. It tastes really bad, like ass and dirt.
User avatar
Harq al Ada
Posts: 122
Joined: 11 Oct 2009 23:00
Location: Mormon country, AZ

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by Harq al Ada »

I'm sorry, at least all of the Fremen in Lynch's wore stillsuits when out of the sietch AND the sietchs were not open air! What the hell does it matter if every once in a great while the scifi Fremen wear stillsuits with face masks outside of an open air sietch? Seriously ridiculous (not even joking a little). And you are all cool with that but oh no, not nose plugs, that's a waste of water.

And Irulan, again, what the hell is that? She's a hip and young and a today kinda young woman. She's not going to put up with her father's machinations??? Maybe she will draw in new female fans??? Really, you all are OK with that but not heart plugs? Or changing Thufir's motivation for working for the Harkonnens? And scifi Yueh? And scifi Fenring? And scifi Thufir? Who were they? 6 hours and if I hadn't read the books I'd have no idea. SciFi Harkonnens were definitely Saturday morning cartoon.

6 hours of McDonalds.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
TheDukester
Posts: 3808
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 13:44
Location: Operation Enduring Bacon

Re: KWISATZ HADERACH

Post by TheDukester »

Harq al Ada wrote:6 hours and if I hadn't read the books I'd have no idea.
Oh, the irony. As if Lynch's alleged "Dune" isn't the very definition of incomprehensible. :roll:

And you rattle off that list of differences like they mean something to you ... but, tell me, how come my copy of Dune doesn't end with a fucking thunderstorm?



"For he is the Kwisatz Haderach!"

Fucking JOKE.
"Anything I write will be remembered and listed in bibliographies on Dune for several hundred years ..." — some delusional halfwit troll.
Post Reply