Take the iSideWith Quiz!
Posted: 21 Jul 2012 10:15
http://www.isidewith.com/presidential-e ... pp_share=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
DUNE DISCUSSION FORUM FOR ORTHODOX HERBERTARIANS
http://www.jacurutu.com/
That's OK, they'll probably still let you vote.ULFsurfer wrote:I'm not American either..
Nekhrun wrote:Are you talking about Jimmy McMillan from The Rent is too Damn High party?
Don't count on it the economy part, my fellow warrior. The man is pretty much ecomically stupid, along with many others of his brethren who are thinking with a Hoover mentality. All the best economists who could save the current depression with their insights are dead (not that Romney would want to take their advice, anyway).WAY too high on Romney he has the personality just above a cardboard cut out figure.
He might do better with the economy, but everything else, forget it.
I'm with ya there. I'm wondering what set of Mitt's stances their survey was comparing my answers with, that I should get a more than 50% agreement rate. I think since he's such an establishment politician you could almost make him out to be whatever you want.Jodorowsky's Acolyte wrote:Don't count on it the economy part, my fellow warrior. The man is pretty much ecomically stupid, along with many others of his brethren who are thinking with a Hoover mentality. All the best economists who could save the current depression with their insights are dead (not that Romney would want to take their advice, anyway).WAY too high on Romney he has the personality just above a cardboard cut out figure.
He might do better with the economy, but everything else, forget it.
I think you can click on the person when complete to see which issues you agreed on. I didn't think that there were any on which I would agree with Romney (in one case it was because I didn't read the abortion issue closely enough). Others I think he pays lip service to (like saying he wouldn't have bailed out the banks. Like hell he wouldn't).Apjak wrote:I'm with ya there. I'm wondering what set of Mitt's stances their survey was comparing my answers with, that I should get a more than 50% agreement rate. I think since he's such an establishment politician you could almost make him out to be whatever you want.Jodorowsky's Acolyte wrote:Don't count on it the economy part, my fellow warrior. The man is pretty much ecomically stupid, along with many others of his brethren who are thinking with a Hoover mentality. All the best economists who could save the current depression with their insights are dead (not that Romney would want to take their advice, anyway).WAY too high on Romney he has the personality just above a cardboard cut out figure.
He might do better with the economy, but everything else, forget it.
[/quote]Apjak wrote:[quote="Some Guy who wrote some little book called "Children of Dune""]Governments, if they endure, always tend increasingly toward aristocratic forms. No government in history has been known to evade this pattern. And as the aristocracy develops, governments tend more and more to act exclusively in the interests of the ruling class--whether that class be hereditary royalty, oligarchs of financial empires, or entrenched bureaucracy.
I agree, Romney bores me to tears.Jodorowsky's Acolyte wrote:Don't count on it the economy part, my fellow warrior. The man is pretty much ecomically stupid, along with many others of his brethren who are thinking with a Hoover mentality. All the best economists who could save the current depression with their insights are dead (not that Romney would want to take their advice, anyway).WAY too high on Romney he has the personality just above a cardboard cut out figure.
He might do better with the economy, but everything else, forget it.
Third parties in US presidential elections are always a fun footnote in history.Nekhrun wrote:She was just arrested yesterday:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/08 ... html?hp=f3" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;