Page 3 of 3
Re: Reasons why Lynch's movie sucked.
Posted: 23 Apr 2012 21:48
by gurensan
He still allowed some people to play in his creation. They had to pay for license royalties or whatever, but he didn't shut it up that tight...
Does KJA own it now? I get the feeling he's in far more control of it than anyone else...
Re: Reasons why Lynch's movie sucked.
Posted: 23 Apr 2012 22:02
by SandRider
we believe that while the "HLP" legally controls the copyrights to Frank's Dune,
(and everything else) with Frank's son Brian as the titular head, Keith is, in fact,
the only human being exercising the execution of those rights, as he sees fit ....
so say we all ?
Re: Reasons why Lynch's movie sucked.
Posted: 23 Apr 2012 23:00
by Freakzilla
SandRider wrote:we believe that while the "HLP" legally controls the copyrights to Frank's Dune,
(and everything else) with Frank's son Brian as the titular head, Keith is, in fact,
the only human being exercising the execution of those rights, as he sees fit ....
so say we all ?
Harumph!
Re: Reasons why Lynch's movie sucked.
Posted: 24 Apr 2012 02:02
by Omphalos
SandRider wrote:we believe that while the "HLP" legally controls the copyrights to Frank's Dune,
(and everything else) with Frank's son Brian as the titular head, Keith is, in fact,
the only human being exercising the execution of those rights, as he sees fit ....
so say we all ?
SO SAY WE ALL!!!