Re: Official no-link-to-DN policy?
Posted: 06 Dec 2010 12:19
And can I just add ...
newfacedancer: total fruitcake.
newfacedancer: total fruitcake.
DUNE DISCUSSION FORUM FOR ORTHODOX HERBERTARIANS
http://www.jacurutu.com/
TheDukester wrote: I just had my first look in quite a while, and it looks like there is no activity to speak of, not even between the preek retards. Most of the "most recent" entries are from November or even before. Some of the McDune entries date to last summer. It's a ghost town.
There's a recipe of mine there for Kangaroo Mouse Gumbo. No cinnamon.merkin muffley wrote:I don't need to look at it. You just add cinnamon to everything.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRankSandRider wrote:and if someone can prove to me that links like these under discussion do, in fact, bolster Merrit's google pagerank,
that'd be interesting information, but I don't think it means anything ...
that's one of my points - the main thing that is affecting a search-rank in this scenarioIt checks all homepages periodically,
As an example, people could previously create many message-board posts with links to their website to artificially inflate their PageRank. With the nofollow value, message-board administrators can modify their code to automatically insert "rel='nofollow'" to all hyperlinks in posts, thus preventing PageRank from being affected by those particular posts. This method of avoidance, however, also has various drawbacks, such as reducing the link value of legitimate comments. (See: Spam in blogs#nofollow)
Calvin Woon and the IM Buzz Creators have never been in any way associated with any complaints or scam reports across the internet. Calvin and his fellow Jonathan Teng are respected among the internet marketing professionals and even gurus.
True. Our small drops would be just that, drops in the water.SandRider wrote:that's one of my points - the main thing that is affecting a search-rank in this scenarioIt checks all homepages periodically,
is links to other pages on a commercial or "authority" website homepage ...
Of course google's pagerank algorithm has inner workings (which they for good reason do not tell about) that identifies and punishes link-spamming. But that in no way means that lesser links are not counted - they are counted by their relative weight. All the home made webshit like jacurutu and our personal blogs are being counted - otherwise, the system wouldn't work.SandRider wrote:Wikipedia is an authority hub.another reason I didn't ever read this wikipedo - the author actually calls wiki an "authority hub" ....
It obviously has a lot of links to it, so any link it supplies carries a lot of weight. Hence 'hub'.
Also, it is as accurate as the best encyclopedia money can buy/we can create - but google doesn't 'know' that (for a certain reading of 'know').
Interesting. I guess Jacurutu has this on (if nothing else, then by bbforum default). Means the whole case is moot...SandRider wrote:but anyway:As an example, people could previously create many message-board posts with links to their website to artificially inflate their PageRank. With the nofollow value, message-board administrators can modify their code to automatically insert "rel='nofollow'" to all hyperlinks in posts, thus preventing PageRank from being affected by those particular posts. This method of avoidance, however, also has various drawbacks, such as reducing the link value of legitimate comments. (See: Spam in blogs#nofollow)
SandRider wrote:...hence, I donot believe any links to any page in a forum, or some asswipe's blagh comments, or any of the other home-made webshit being counted ...
Especially you.jannypan wrote:Un-enforced rule sounds like the plan to me. Every once in a while it might be appropriate to link, but we should all certainly aim to do it as little as possible.
Having fun, are you?Freakzilla wrote:Especially you.jannypan wrote:Un-enforced rule sounds like the plan to me. Every once in a while it might be appropriate to link, but we should all certainly aim to do it as little as possible.
in the last six months, I've found myself going to wikipedia first,Lundse wrote: Wikipedia is an authority hub.