Jᴀᴄᴜʀᴜᴛᴜ - Tʜᴇ Cᴀsᴛ Oᴜᴛ

Hi, Mark here, and I generally try to post avoiding non sequiturs when I can....mostly failing however.

Quod non sequitur non interest.

Quod erat demonstrandum.

Consummatum est.

Dictis Angle, Oepide!

Eheu...Americani.


Remember that scene from The Life of Brian when the centurian takes the graffitist to task for his bad Latin?

Ahem.

Loquere Anglice! if you mean one or the other of us.
Loquimini Anglice! if you mean both. (Singular vs plural imperative)

Now write the one you meant 100 times, numbering them using Roman numerals.

SandChigger wrote:Eheu...Americani.


Remember that scene from The Life of Brian when the centurian takes the graffitist to task for his bad Latin?

Ahem.

Loquere Anglice! if you mean one or the other of us.
Loquimini Anglice! if you mean both. (Singular vs plural imperative)

Now write the one you meant 100 times, numbering them using Roman numerals.

"The one you meant 100 times." OK now?

But I can still stand behind "Oepide."

Omphalos wrote:"The one you meant 100 times." OK now?

No. The correct response was

The one you meant 100 times, numbering them using Roman numerals.

HA!

But I can still stand behind "Oepide."

I certainly wouldn't advise standing in front of him. Might have a flashback and confuse you with his father...nasty outcome likely, that.


(Sorry, Inhuien, we've quite derailed your personal thread. )

Please don't say sorry it's really no problem, anyway it's not as if it was a non sequitur;))

We two do tend to get carried away.

(It's mostly him, though. )

teehee:)

Now you're not saying Big O's and bad effluence on you??

Who, me? Never!

flatulence?

That was the fartest thing from my mind, I assure you!

effluence? flatulence? Get it?

Hey, inhuien!

I forgot to add this morning: just because a thing is not linked to, doesn't mean it's not there.

Plans within plans


















I'm not sure what this post means either.

“They never blow but they suck!”